PCSO candidate Frederick campaigns on “blue-helmet free zone”

Terry Frederick, candidate for Pima County Sheriff has turned his sites on the U.N., as part of his campaign strategy. Frederick has “grown concerned about the upcoming United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).”

Frederick claims that his campaign’s “investigative team has discovered that this treaty is part of a plan that was launched in 1961 when Under Secretary of State, Chester Bowles, ran the Department of State for the Secretary. This plan is clearly described in a shocking document titled, “Freedom From War – The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World”.

Frederick claims that “Due to recent secrecy at the United Nation’s hearings about the ATT, established after they became aware that the National Rifle Association (NRA) began attending previously public meetings, it is not known the exact wording of the treaty at this point. The exact wording may not be known until Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signs the treaty on July 27th, 2012.”

Fredericks informs his followers that “contributions to a United Nations Peace Force means” that the feds will “tax you and use those funds to pay foreign nations to take your own rights away. You will pay to have your own lives put into peril.”

Frederick says that he will “make a promise to the citizens of Pima County, Arizona, that as your neighborhood Sheriff I will do everything that my duty requires to protect your safety and to fight crime. This promise includes preventing un-Constitutional orders from harming your safety and welfare.”

Frederick “has a history of working as a process server and private investigator, both in Arizona and another state, for a period of nine (9) years” prior to 2011, according to court documents.

Frederick had “applied to be working for the Tombstone Marshall’s Office,” according to court records, but is now running or Pima County Sheriff.

Frederick pledges that he will “deliver to you a blue-helmet free zone.”

9 Comments

  1. The guys in the tin foil hat will be “investigating” for the guys blue hats. Could work out for the rest of us in the end, they will be so busy that we can go about our business.

  2. “Frederick claims that his campaign’s “investigative team has discovered that this treaty is part of a plan that was launched in 1961 when Under Secretary of State,….”

    Scarey Terry just couldn’t stand that Sheriff Joe has an investigative Posse that has stolen the spot light so he came up with “Blue Helmet free zone”. You can’t be a serious candidate.

    • Right, and the best candidate is not going to end up embarassing us just like Dupnik did. Get real! This guy is as out of touch as Dupnik! It looks to me like he needs a job and will say or do anything to get one.

  3. Listen closely. Before you get too sidetracked on any UN ideas or views that only you seem really concerned about, don’t you think it might be a good idea at this stage to tell the people in Pima County HOW you plan to protect them from crime or why you think (as a person not having more than a high school education) that you are the least bit qualified or competent enough to spend millions of our dollars to manage our police policies?

    What about the department’s budget? Are we going to have to wait until AFTER you are elected to find out where the cuts and changes are that you intend to make? Have you ever managed people? I’m very concerned because you are the least qualified to be our sheriff. Are you bringing up UN issues because you know you cannot possibly beat Dupnik? Are you so self-absorbed that you’re unaware that what you are worried about way over at the UN is only making a joke of a very serious local process?

  4. From court documents…..

    “Prior to Mr. Montgomery’s entering into the case, the court previously denied a generic request filed by Mr. Frederick to seal the file. If counsel believes there is a particular document which could be harmful in any specific way, the court can address the matter. Absent a showing of that, the Rule is clear that the court needs to balance and weigh the public’s right to information versus the parties’ right to keep confidential certain information. That needs to be shown by an affirmative pleading which can be addressed at a hearing.”

    Why did you want it sealed Terry?

  5. Terry take it from me we have enough problems already focus…focus.. or go back to serving divorce papers

    Spousal maintenance? Really? Hmmmmmm

  6. So the good guys wear tin foil hats, and the bad guys wear blue hats, and Terry is the new leader?

Comments are closed.