Private companies propose to build South Mountain Freeway

carsA group of private companies have suggested a public-private partnership to construct the proposed South Mountain Freeway, perhaps paving the way to a faster and less-expensive model for construction. The highway, if built under this proposal, would not be a toll road. This is the first unsolicited proposal for a highway public-private partnership submitted to the Arizona Department of Transportation.

Under state law, ADOT is required to conduct an initial review of the proposal – which the private companies pay for – before deciding if the concept merits an open solicitation for other companies to submit competitive proposals. According to ADOT, the freeway remains a corridor under study, and this public-private partnership proposal will not have any impact on the ongoing environmental impact statement that is scheduled to be finalized in 2014.

The environmental impact statement must be completed and acceptable to the Federal Highway Administration regardless of how the proposed project is funded or constructed. “Any public-private partnership proposal has to be aligned with the goals and interests of taxpayers. We look for concepts that can be done better, faster and less expensively, providing real value for the traveling public,” said ADOT Director John Halikowski. “As the first unsolicited proposal for a highway project, this concept shows the role ADOT is playing in seeking innovative solutions to address the state’s transportation challenges.”

The proposal requires that the private investors pay for the costs of the project and thru efficiency of doing the designing, engineering and building the freeway in-house, reduce overhead. As a result, the state is able to afford to repay the investors with profit plus interest from highway funds and still save taxpayer dollars.

The private companies – led by Kiewit Development Co., Kiewit Infrastructure West Co., Sundt Construction, Inc. and Parsons Corporation – are working under the name South Mountain Development Group. The group has outlined several potential benefits of the public-private partnership:

• Examine constructing the entire corridor at a lower cost and ahead of the current planned schedule
• Explore private sector investment and financial solutions that may maximize the use and allocation of limited public funds with no tolling or user fees
• Offer flexibility to adapt to changes in project concept, with no involvement in the environmental process or selection of the project alignment
• Provide significant subcontracting and job opportunities for local contractors to ensure the greatest benefit to the local economy and taxpayers

According to an executive summary of the proposal submitted by South Mountain Development Group, “The South Mountain Freeway is a critical project to the region and its economic recovery. It has been on the books for 30 years and has been part of a regional freeway plan approved on two separate ballot measures, first in 1985 and again in 2004. Early delivery of this project will reduce congestion, create an economic boost by generating much needed construction jobs and provide a long awaited route to bypass downtown Phoenix.”

Environmentalists have raised $300,000 according to the Arizona Republic, to mount an environmental lawsuit to kill the freeway. The Republic reports that the Gila River Indian Community took a formal “no build” position on the project, telling ADOT it preferred no freeway at all to one that would cut through hills on the edge of South Mountain Park.

ADOT has authority to partner with the private sector to build or improve Arizona transportation facilities.

A public-private partnership, often simply called a P3, refers to the contractual agreement between a public agency and a private sector entity that allows the private sector entity to have greater participation in the delivery of a transportation project. Using traditional project delivery methods, ADOT bears all of the risks and responsibilities for a project. Under a public-private partnership, the private partner takes on some or all of the project’s risks and responsibilities.

Following the initial review of the concept, ADOT will complete a more detailed analysis of the partnership proposal. If the proposal passes this second phase, and there is a determination of merit, ADOT may use any part or the entire unsolicited proposal as the basis for a request for proposals seeking other firms to submit competitive proposals.


  1. Don’t go and vote for this “great idea” just because it sounds like it could be a great idea. Private toll roads sound good until they’re built and the note comes due. People WILL NOT pay for something they can get for free and toll roads are at the top of that list.

    In Virginia, a privately owned (private land) 14 mile long toll road called the Dulles Greenway was built between Leesburg and Dulles Int’l to relieve traffic.

    You can go read about it but the first thing that happened after it was built, and just before the bills came due, was that no one would pay the toll, the company went bankrupt and screwed everyone involved.

    They eventually found a buyer and it’s going a lot better some 10 or 15 years later, but it’s been a very costly project for everyone.

  2. Careful now…you’re going to anger the progressives amongst us. It appears to be their goal to destroy business and eliminate the Constitution.

    How UN American of them.

  3. I like the idea, I hope it catches on with other areas of this type such as water works, road maintenance like resurfacing streets, when the state does it – we pay for the building etc. but then we pay for the retirements for years on years – thus we buy the same project over again – let private industry build smarter – less expensive roads for a fee – what an American idea.

Comments are closed.