One of Robert Gates’ more real legacies

gatesBy Winslow T. Wheeler

Today’s fixation in Washington is former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ so-called new revelation, breathlessly reported by the Washington Post (Robert Woodward), the New York Times (Thom Shanker) and others, that Barack Obama was not fully committed to George Bush’s (and Robert Gates’) war in Afghanistan, especially the troop surge there, which Obama allowed himself to be maneuvered into by the Pentagon’s generals (and Robert Gates). We are then blown away – well, not entirely – by the other dramatic news from Gates that Hilary Clinton said politics influenced her own position during her 2007-8 presidential campaign on the other troop surge – the one in Iraq. Quite a stunner, eh?

Without giving this fluff any further attention, it’s time to consider something a little more important and a little less comforting to those seeking to distract us from the effects of their handiwork.

Consider the question of life and death. Specifically, almost a half a million deaths, mostly of civilians. That is the tally in Iraq directly attributable to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq: “461,000, just under half a million people,” a recent study says. It came out in October 2013 (I had cast it into my to-read pile; I finally got to it; I urge you to read it-more promptly than I did).

“Mortality in Iraq Associated with the 2003-2011 War and Occupation: Findings from a National Cluster Sample Survey by the University Collaborative Iraq Mortality Study” appears in an international, peer reviewed publication, PLOS Medicine. The study is the work of researchers at the University of Washington, Johns Hopkins, Fraser University in Canada and the Iraqi Ministry of Health. The typical Washington apparatchik will ignore the study as from an obscure publication; individuals with any interest in data and analysis will look at the article’s description of its methodology and realize that this is a piece of research that cannot be ignored – even if Washington already has.

In summary, the study surveyed 2,000 randomly selected households throughout Iraq, using methods to ensure the sample was nationally representative – including of those who were either internally or externally displaced. Direct interviews were the primary data collection technique–with procedures to verify what the interviewers were being told.

As to findings-

• “The wartime crude death rate in Iraq was 4.55 per 1,000 PY (95% UI 3.74-5.27), more than 0.5 times higher than the 2.89 ((95% UI 1.56-4.04) death rate during the 26-mo period preceding the war. By multiplying those rates by the annual Iraq population, we estimate total excess Iraqi deaths attributable to the war through mid-2011 as about 405,000 (95% UI 48,000-751,000).” (page 7)

• “Conservatively, assuming that only 15% of the emigrant households experienced a death, our migration adjustment would add more than 55,000 deaths to the total generated by our household survey..” (page 9)

• “Our total excess death estimate for the wartime period, then, is 461,000, just under half a million people.”(page 10)

• “US-led coalition forces were reported to be responsible for the largest proportion of war-related violent deaths (35%), followed by militia (32%). While militia were reportedly responsible for the most adult male deaths in the sibling survey, coalition forces were reportedly responsible for killing the most women.” (Page 6)

Americans should not take solace from the finding that 65 percent of the war-related violent deaths were from non-Americans. It is not just that women were victimized by us (or rather our coalition) more than by others, but also consider that America initiated the social and political forces that resulted in all of the half million deaths – a tally that Saddam Hussein at his worst would have envied and that would put him in a category of mass murderers second only to Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot.

It is also highly likely that the 460,000 deaths are an undercount. The baseline death rate was the 26 month period, just before the 2003 US invasion, in March 2001; that was a death rate already elevated by the effects on the Iraqi infrastructure from the bombing of civilian targets (such as water treatment facilities and electricity generation) during Operation Desert Storm in 1991 and also elevated by years of US-led economic sanctions. Moreover, it is not clear if the new study included infant mortality in its accounting, and its assertion that only 15 percent of the families that left Iraq during the US occupation had a death in the family seems more than a little conservative for that group.

Perhaps the upper bounds of the statistical analysis (751,000 deaths, or more if you include the emigrant households) approach the reality of the impact of the American invasion and occupation.

No wonder they kicked us out in 2011 and don’t want us back now.

For it all, we have many people to thank, not just Robert Gates. Anyone reading this commentary knows their names. However, as you contemplate Gates’ efforts to write his own legacy, think about what he was a part of – but which his eagerly fawning reviewers write no whisper of.

(For an antidote to the press characterization of Gates as the best Secretary of Defense since the title was created, consider some different views here, here, here and here.)


  1. The “death rate” pre-war does not include those Shiites and Kurds killed by the Hussein regime. Saddam made sure that they did include deaths from malnutrition, though – malnutrition caused by the Hussein regime, in collaboration with UN corruptocrats, selling off the food that was supposedly swapped for oil.

    I will agree that the deaths during the war were higher than they should have been – mostly because our military was not allowed to squash the so-called “insurgents” (actually, foreign terrorists) with overwhelming force whenever they raised their heads.

  2. War is hell. A few of the uncomfortable facts that these fictional toll-creators ignore in fashioning their anti-American military diatribe are actually widely known.

    Cowardly muslim terrorists hide behind women, children, old folks when trying to kill American troops. They kidnap the human shields and force them to stand as a barrier, knowing that American troops are reluctant to endanger the innocents. They even use their own families as shields. This strategy still works well, because American troops are civilized human beings.

    Cowardly muslim terrorists kill entire families, neighborhoods, towns to enforce their stranglehold over the innocent citizens. If the locals are reluctant to cooperate with these cowards, or if they are just too slow to accommodate, they are turned into civilian casualties by their blood-thirsty muslim captors, to become convenient numbers for the anti-American military fictional toll-creators.

    When these rag-wrapped cowardly muslim terrorists are finally exterminated, they can be counted as civilian casualties because they don’t wear khaki uniforms with epaulets. Then they and their 72 fictional virgins can become “civilian casualties” for the anti-American military fictional toll-creators. How conveniently the numbers accumulate, and become fodder for the anti-American military elite at home.

    With all of those civilian casualties, there must be lots of room for the anti-American exceptionalism crowd to take up residency – over there. War is hell, but then again – Freedom isn’t free.

    God bless America, and all of her heroes who defend US.

Comments are closed.