NAU Students Issue “List Of Demands” #nautakeover

#nautakeover by Queers and Allies, student members of the Queer Activist Collective, Black Student Union, and PRISM students

On Tuesday, Northern Arizona University students tore a page out of the Yale University student body notebook and issued a list of #blacklivesmatter demands in a letter to the University’s administration. The letter was recently found online with multiple hashtags including #nautakeover, #truebluenau and #concernedstudent1950.

The letter was signed by “Queers and Allies, student members of the Queer Activist Collective, Black Student Union, and PRISM students.”

In their letter, the students warn the administration that if they do not receive a response to their demands by the Office of Student Life, President Rita Cheng, and the University Provost, “with an action plan by January 19th, 2016,” they will “take appropriate nonviolent actions which will escalate until our demands are met.”

The letter writers accuse the administration of failing “to provide security and the proper resources for its most vulnerable students, has encouraged the racial tokenization of students and faculty, has encouraged the NAU Police Department to interfere with student activism, has allowed those involved in student activism to be harassed by University employees, and has allowed these students’ reputation to be slandered by other students and faculty members.”

They claim that the administration has silenced “the student voice,” and thus “the university has directly damaged the mental and physical health of the students whom it claims to support.” They claim this has interfered “with their academic success.”

“We are taking it upon ourselves to hold this university accountable. We too believe that NAU exists for its students; we too believe that it is an essential responsibility of this institution to serve its students well. If this university truly abides by the mission statement above and aims to provide students access to a quality higher education, then it must be willing and eager to work with us. For this reason, we have included a student organized list of demands,” reads the letter.

James T. Harris, an NAU dad and popular radio show host, who describes himself as an American of African descent stated, “We’ve been asking for weeks now, when and where will this madness stop. NAU has the opportunity to say ‘here and now.’ It won’t be easy. What we are witnessing is nothing less than the Obama Cultural Revolution. Millennial agitators would know that if they studied history instead they are doomed by repeating it.”

In their list of demands, they do offer specific incidents in which administrators were less than sensitive.

List of Demands:

1. We demand that Northern Arizona University administration publicly acknowledge and formally apologize for endangering, harassing, and slandering queer and trans student activists. Specifically we demand apologies for the following:

Chris Schlarb, Senior Program Coordinator of the LGBTQIA Office of Resources Support, called the work supervisor of a student activist suggesting that said student not work during this year’s Coming Out Monologues; under different conditions, this may have endangered this person’s employment and left them without income. Chris has also told other student workers in the LGBTQIA Office that parts of last year’s Queer Activist Monologue submission were untrue, resulting in the defamation of personal lived accounts.

Yoleidy Rosario, Assistant Director of Inclusion and Multicultural services, has repeatedly engaged with queer students in a manner unbefitting a representative of the university. While attending a Queer and Allies club meeting, she repeatedly interrupted the meeting, accused members of microaggressions, and whispered and took notes throughout the meeting. For many of the Freshman Students in attendance this behavior was their first impression of the LEADS Center. Yoleidy has also harassed Q&A members at the Coming Out Week tabling event, stating that she wouldn’t work with Q&A because they were ‘too angry’ at their last meeting, and directed this to the students waiting to approach the table.

Bernadine Lewis, Director of Undergraduate Programs at W.A. Franke College of Business, shouted “excuse me” over the voices of queer student activists and referred to a nonviolent direct action group as less respectful than the KKK at the Coming Out Monologues. They stated that the KKK at least had the respect to wait until church services were over before they “disrupted” congregations. It is unacceptable for a university faculty member to compare a nonviolent queer activist group to a violent white supremacist terrorist group.

All parties affiliated with the decision to engage and request police at a queer student event with the intent to retaliate and enforce punishment/forced removal of students.

2. NAU administration must be in direct and open dialogue with the students it claims to serve. We demand that along with transparency, NAU must have a representative student held position- this student must be attuned to the campus and community needs and receptive to student conversations. This position should oversee various offices and have the power to intervene when the needs of marginalized students are not being met. This position should be protected from any retaliation that may be present when advocating and representing various student needs. This position must be paid and will ensure student involvement and advocacy at the institutional level.

3. The inflammatory language used by NAU staff to label, stigmatize, and target students who openly express concerns about the way NAU has dealt with violence perpetrated on its campus has escalated the danger faced by students rather than addressing student concerns. The dysfunctional effect of this response from NAU staff cannot be understated, the antagonism from certain staff served to ostracize particular students and escalate antagonism between student groups that further endangered and jeopardized student lives. Specifically, a student found the words “go kill yourself” written on the window their car in a university parking lot. We demand that the University recognize the need for student and faculty feedback, as an essential part of creating a healthy and safe learning environment. Rather than retaliating against dissenting feedback in order to protect the public reputation of the university, threatening jobs and student funding, the university must engage in a mediated dialogue with student concerns. NAU administration must take responsibility in engaging with students and student activists in a productive and transparent dialogue, instead of perpetuating violence and risking the safety of students. We demand that NAU administration construct a space conducive to nonviolent conflict resolution, as well as a monthly open forum (with President Cheng and other administration present) to assess student needs and engage directly with student feedback. Further, it is apparent there is a disconnect between administration and the needs of its student body; this forum will directly bridge that gap.

4. We demand that NAU completely redesign their reporting process and conflict resolution procedure in order to better serve the needs of victimized students.

NAU must provide students with an effective silent witness program. Students will be able to use this program to anonymously report violence that has been done to them. Further, this program must exist separately from both NAU PD and the Office of Student Life. Those who oversee this program must have a comprehensive critical understanding of the university structure and processes, but must explicitly use this understanding to protect those who have been victims of violence. Under no circumstances should this program prioritize the university’s reputation; it must always be aligned with the victim’s best interests.

NAU must hold students who perpetrate violence accountable for their actions on and off campus. On multiple occasions, members of NAU fraternities have threatened and assaulted students and other individuals visiting Flagstaff. In several of these assaults, NAU fraternity members specifically and intentionally targeted people of color because of their race. This culture of violence was not absent in the time preceding the deadly shooting that occurred earlier this year and, had NAU been more proactive in preventing violent student behavior, this shooting may never have had happened.

NAU must report staff/faculty/students/departments who use racial slurs and ask black students to act as the spokesperson of their race in class, trainings, and other programs (i.e. Health promotions – did not feel the need for bystander training to combat racial discrimination)

The safety of the students is of higher priority than the university’s public reputation: It is the responsibility of Northern Arizona University’s administration to ensure that NAU’s students, faculty members, and staff are aware of racism, sexism, ableism, transphobia, queerphobia, and other forms of injustice that occur on school grounds. Because of this, we demand that acts against marginalized students are accurately and appropriately recorded, then widely reported to the NAU and Flagstaff community.

5. The process for reporting and responding to bias reports and hate crimes needs to be left in the hands of one office with specializations in trauma, disability, race, and the needs of queer and trans students, with adherence to the University’s Safe Work and Learning Environment Policy.

NAU’s bias reporting system is overly bureaucratic with many different offices handling bias reporting. This creates inconsistency among response from the University to incidents of bias and hate crimes, as these offices all operate differently and represent different interests. Further, through the language of a “bias incident,” the University creates an environment in which the severity and systemic nature of discrimination and prejudice is diminished and unacknowledged. We demand an overhaul to the University’s system for reporting hate crimes and bias incidents, as well as for providing support and communication with students who are the victims of hate crimes and bias incidents that prioritizes the safety and wellbeing of students over the University’s reputation.

6. We demand that the University prioritize the safety and well-being of black students, and black student activists above the reputation of the University. Racism and other forms of discrimination should not be tolerated or swept under the rug like it has been many times in the past. Additionally, Northern Arizona University must address racism on campus and in the Flagstaff community to ensure institutional support for black students: just because it does not happen on Northern Arizona University’s campus, does not mean that community and global events do not affect us physically, emotionally, and mentally. We further demand the protection of black student activists and the underrepresented faculty and staff who support these student activists; student activists who are our future leaders pave the way for positive change.

7. We demand that Northern Arizona University provides protection of staff and faculty who support activists and activism, and/or may be activists themselves. Staff and faculty should not have to face losing their job for encouraging and supporting their students, or for statements or action that calls for accountability from the University. There is a rich history of collaboration between professors and students in advancing social movements, and we will not stand for faculty, staff, and professors being silenced and threatened by administration.

8. It is the University’s responsibility to provide and ensure the safety of its students. This includes students living in on-campus housing who do not have homes to return to following the end of the semester, or have extenuating circumstances regarding affording housing. Students of color, trans students, and students with disabilities are particularly vulnerable and susceptible to homelessness. We demand a need based Crisis Fund to be distributed in a non-meritocratic way. A student’s academic performance should not determine their eligibility for University offered resources.

9. We demand that Northern Arizona University stop expanding its student population at the expense of local communities of color and other marginalized populations. The University’s expansion perpetuates the gentrification of Flagstaff neighborhoods, displacing working class people and people of color. Regardless of certain statewide initiatives, the University’s expansion should never be prioritized above local communities that NAU claims to support and hopes to welcome within the student body.

10. We demand the review of Northern Arizona University’s contract with Sodexo — an organization that benefits from the pernicious prison industrial complex system that negatively impacts the black community and queer and/or trans* populations on a national and local level.

11. We demand the elimination of the tokenism of administrators, faculty, staff, and students to create “diverse” propaganda for Northern Arizona University that does not display the true nature of NAU’s campus climate. Resources and programs such as workshops, panels and other various ally training must be designed and led by marginalized groups. We demand the consultation of black students and faculty during the implementation of diversity initiatives to create effective diversity training for all first-year students, transfer students, student athletes, student workers, faculty, staff, and administration.

12. Many students, staff, and faculty have expressed discontent and concern with the effectiveness and competency of the University’s current Safe Zone Training in actually providing information and tools necessary for creating safe spaces and an atmosphere of respect for queer and trans students, students with disabilities (mental and physical), and students of color. We demand a paid multi-student review process of Safe Zone in order to cultivate environments which truly serve the needs of the University’s most vulnerable students to its fullest and most immediate capacity. This multi-student review effort must be led by students directly impacted (students of color, students with disabilities, queer and/or trans students) This needs to include, but shall not be limited to, sensitivity training regarding race, culture and ethnicity, knowledge and understanding of disability, and training on the importance of pronouns and names that do not situate them as mere “preferences.” Further, we demand that the new and improved Safe Zone training be mandatory for any person working on campus, including those who are not employed specifically by the University. This not only establishes respect and understanding between students and employees on campus, but also among employees as well.

13. We demand that there is no longer any active police presence at events that are designed to be safe spaces for marginalized populations. NAU administrators have repeatedly relied on police presence in spaces of marginalized groups as a means of control, which, rather than increasing student safety, actually puts students’ safety at risk. At the 2015 NAU Coming Out Monologues, NAU PD was present in plainclothes and forcibly removed a queer, trans student from the building against their will. Later, in the University newspaper, The Lumberjack, this student was cited as being “belligerent” in the Police Beat, while videos and countless eyewitness accounts tell how this could not be further from the truth. Systemically, queer and trans students and students of color are at the highest risk of encountering violence and police brutality, and thus if NAU intends to create a safe space, the police absolutely cannot be present.

14. We demand an increase in faculty of color and trans and/or queer faculty positions in all departments representative of the nationwide population, including an increase in people of color, queer, and trans Resident Assistants, Resident Hall Directors, administrators, faculty, and tenured faculty.

NAU currently does not have a tenure track for the vital department and programs of Women’s and Gender Studies and Queer Studies. These faculty members place equal amounts of dedication and time into their work as any other department and receive significantly less benefits and job security. We demand there no longer be a divide and marginalization between which programs are deemed “more important” and that resources are allocated appropriately and equally.

We demand that NAU create an Ethnic Studies requirement distinct from the cultural understanding: require every student to fulfill at least three Ethnic Studies credits to learn more about diverse populations of people and emphasize the importance of this knowledge as a life enhancement. NAU also must create an undergraduate Ethnic Studies Major; our history should not simply be an elective. The Ethnic Studies major and credit requirements should both be implemented by the Fall semester of 2016.

15. We demand that Northern Arizona University implement gender neutral bathrooms in all buildings on campus. NAU has currently attempted to implement such bathrooms. These restrooms are single-stall “family bathrooms” and do not promote gender inclusivity or an equal space for transgender or gender-nonconforming students. The signs on these bathrooms must be blatantly and directly gender-neutral (not family restrooms). Additionally, these restrooms must be accessible for students with physical disabilities. The office of LGTBQIA Resources and Support has demonstrated “bathroom take overs” during Trans* Awareness Week. These events consist of tabling and distribution of flyers. These flyers consist of information on what it means to be a good ally in the bathroom and how to make trans individuals more comfortable in gendered bathrooms. These flyers are damaging and make trans students hypervisible as well as promote stigmas as to what it means to “look trans”. Transgender students are policed and marginalized on a daily basis by peers and faculty alike. The office of Resources and Support should not contribute to these stigmas and marginalization. Takeovers and assessing the needs of these students should be hosted by the students in need.

16. While the multiplicity of student organizations, departments, courses, and offices represent a wide range of different interests, perspectives, and experiences, we have determined that there is a lack of communication and dialogue among those with interrelated interests. LGBTQIA Resources and Support working nearly exclusively with PRISM has created feelings of divisiveness among student organizations, for example. PRISM is a student led and ran organization, not the face of the LGBTQIA resources and support office. Therefore we demand that all events by the LGBTQIA office should not be pawned off on PRISM, as PRISM does not represent anyone but the LGBT students of Northern Arizona University. We demand complete separation, as an organization, from the LGBTQIA resources and support office.

17. Students who spend energy transforming an unsafe, hostile working and learning environment on campus must be validated in their work. When it becomes mandatory for student survival to work toward student safety on campus, then academic responsibilities will be compromised as a direct result to this lack of safety. We demand that the sacrifices made by student activists be accounted for. Ethnic Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies, and Queer Studies especially must accommodate student activist work because of these disciplines’ roots within activism and their courses’ commitments to critical thinking and inclusivity.

18. NAU’s mission statement states that “Our students are at the center of all we do and all we hope to do. They are the reason why NAU exists. And one of the most fulfilling aspects of being a high-performing university is knowing we serve our students well. Their success is more than a mission statement, more than a goal—it’s a value, along with access, and quality, and the excellence of their experience.” If student success and well-being is truly the university’s goal, there needs to be mandatory mental health training for NAU instructors that is sensitive to student mental/psychological health. This training needs to be a distinct and in depth program for instructors–separate from Safe Zone Training–that prioritizes making students comfortable participating in class and acknowledges self care (sic), mental health breaks, and participation outside of class as viable and acceptable options for neurodivergent students.

19. The University’s current policy to submit a name and gender change in the registrar is inaccessible and results in unnecessary “out-ing” of queer and trans students that comprises their safety and comfortability. While students have been able to get a “preferred name” change for their Jacks Card, this is insufficient as students (sic) names on rosters, BBLearn, and NAU still reflect the registrar. We demand that the University implement a streamlined process for students to be able to change their name and gender on BBLearn, the University’s assigned gmail accounts, as well as within the registrar itself, that does not require documentation “proving” the student’s gender.

20. Budget cuts resulted in eradication of disability resource busses. This is unacceptable. We demand that there be a reallocation of funds in order to reinstate disability resource buses as well as other programs that directly support the safety, wellbeing, and success of marginalized students.

Many are questioning how the seemingly spoiled students could be so demanding when the school is surrounded by a community which includes very poor Native Americans.


  1. I’m waiting for the first articulate college president to step up and stop the madness and stand up for solid American principles and the taxpayers who keep the colleges open. He or she will become a hero and may even have a shot at high elective office.

  2. “The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.” (Michael Swift Manifestó para: 10)

    Here is something if you listen closely you will hear in the defense of CC
    although it will called “exploring deeper meaning” “robust” “rigorous” “exploring difference”. Obama euphemistically calls it “school safety”.

    This reminds us of Ms. Clinton’s and the democrats transformation from staunch traditional marraige to “it takes a village.”

  3. It is not like we weren’t warned over the last 30 years. Now we have a situation where you are going to be asked to choose a side and commit resources if not your life to heal this problem. How much are our/your children worth to you?

    When this “Manifesto” version first appeared it was described by the author as a “farce”. Does what is happening in the courts, schools, city government, colleges and workplace feel like farce to you? The recall Douglas found it roots in the quagmire of the queer community.

    “We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks.”

  4. Damn, I was just about to write Billy’s exact words. Exactly Billy. CLOSE IT! Nobody gives a damn about these brats sexual preferences. They use it as title to show us that they and their president “showed us”. First by lighting up the White House in rainbow colors. No one in Washington even had the courtesy to lower the flag when American hero Chris Kyle was murdered! Now they want special provisions because they are queer! F*@! that! I am so sick of this PC candy @$$ BS. Close the school and reopen it as a Trades school for Electricians, pipe layers, plumbers and steel workers. No more left wing indoctrination. Who the hell do these people think they are? I am thankful today that my kids know I would have whipped their a$$if they had pulled something like this. I’m also thankful I never had to worry about it. Schools are just as bad because you can bet there will be concessions. Our kids have become the French! They definitely need some basic training!

  5. If the University gives in to any demands, they will make additional demands. The Governer and Board of Regents should make sure that NAU does not concede to even one demand. Refund their money and ship them out. They got to realize they are not entitled to special rights. Our constitution gives everyone equal rights. Maybe our schools don’t teach that. Otherwise shut the place down !!

  6. ‘if they don’t like it and want to quit and go off to their safe zone… don’t let the door hit ya in the backside on the way out… and git off my tax roll and dole – go to the happy place

  7. Hope these “students” graduate soon so they’ll be able to begin their education. Buncha “social justice” scheitzers.

  8. As an Arizona tax payer, I have just one demand.

    1. End all state expenditures to the Northern Arizona University, its Students, and its Staff.

  9. If this is what happens when we elect a black socialist as President, we may never see another one. 14 months and counting. Be on guard.

  10. “Whispering and taking notes during the meeting?” Why did we ever get rid of the electric chair? At least we still have lethal injection.

    Close this school and let’s see the backlash these selfish crybabies suffer. Get over yourselves. Some of us don’t care.

  11. Immoral, Decadent, Deviant, Immoral, Mentally Ill people and DAN people making B.S. demand’s which show’s that the Mentally Competent people have let this whole Politically Correct B.S. get way out of hand. If I was the president of this University I would tell these idiot’s that if they do not like the current policies to get the &%$# out and stay out. They should have learned by studying history that our once great country was made great by Politically Incorrect White people that have let the Mentally Ill and Minorities drag it down to what it has become today. A weak nation with too many cowardly morons who’s only interest’s are to whine and snivel about irrelevant thing’s. These people are Non Essential, Expendable and Do Not Matter. It you want to see just how STUPID the Millennial’s are, watch Watter’s World on the Fox News channel. You will also learn how the DEMONcrats are destroying our Liberties and RIGHT’S.

  12. The Board of Regents has rolled out a plan to have NAU administration take over all the AZ Land State Universities for undergrad programs. Leaving the other two Universities with special colleges targeted at specific fields. College of Mining , Agriculture, Medical etc. UofA. the colleges of Business, Education, Law, etc. This has not yet been fully implemented as it progresses further in the legislature. This group is vying for a special position to be incorporated into the undergrad program. They would like to have a veto capable, consultant mandated from this group in every aspect of Undergrad administrations and the pinnacle of this is to have guaranteed a position on the regents as over sight as well. But I feel that this group has lumped me into a category that I don’t believe. I don’t think that the groups is uniquely categorized to represent and I fit into two of the groups.

  13. I Agree whole wholeheartedly with Billy, we would be looking for another school especially if the administration caves to this unsubstantiated special interest crap.

    And Ditto to what Harris Said:

    James T. Harris, an NAU dad and popular radio show host, who describes himself as an American of African descent stated, “We’ve been asking for weeks now, when and where will this madness stop. NAU has the opportunity to say ‘here and now.’ It won’t be easy. What we are witnessing is nothing less than the Obama Cultural Revolution. Millennial agitators would know that if they studied history instead they are doomed by repeating it.”

  14. All these students are acting like the immature little brats that they are! They are going to be our future and that is real scary. Glad I (hopefully) won’t be around to live in their world.

    • WSJ had an interesting commentary by Bret Stephens yesterday called “Radical Parents Despotic Children”. Started with reminder about the 1975 book “Liberal Parents, Radical Children” by Midge Decter, “which tried to make sense of how a generation of munificent parents raised that self-obsessed, politically spastic generation known as the Baby Boomers. The book was a case study in the tragedy of good intentions.”
      ……”For almost 50 years universities have adopted racialist policies in the name of equality, repressive speech codes in the name of tolerance, ideological orthodoxy in the name of intellectual freedom. Sooner or later, Orwellian methods will lead to Orwellian outcomes. Those coddled, bullying undergrads shouting their demands for safer spaces, easier classes, and additional racial set-asides are exactly what the campus faculty and administrators deserve.”

  15. Well guess this shows what we have for ‘future leaders’. Cannot think on their own, can only follow other losers who also do not have a clue. BLM sure, but I thought it was supposed to be ALL LIVES MATTER? Where are these clowns with all the black on black, brown on brown violence? Not to be heard from are they?

    No its too easy to just think about SELF and how to live off the gratuity of the working slobs in this country. If things were in reality so bad it would have been better to bring it up to the public attention, now that ‘supposed students’ have learned from other ‘supposed students’ in other areas, they think that if they make noise like all the others (maybe 1%) that they will get everything free. Hope the people from the school stand tough and that the real students push these idiots out and continue to try and get an education. But very little probability of that happening.

  16. If my kid were attending that school this year – there would be some very serious consideration of next years payment, in fact next semesters fee’s would be in serious question.

  17. Close it – have a very close friend loved one about to get a degree from NAU – once done in another month – Close it – if this is what campus life is about – if this is all they can come up with to better mankind – if this is the topic of worry – if this is ‘the problem’ – if this is what they think… close it. Not worth the money ‘we the taxpayers are paying for this. I know this is a limited few in numbers, that are getting way way way over the top attention for the declarations of ‘me too victimness’ but if this is the game as they see it – we too can play and the white – Mexican half breed organization for the betterment of taxpayer outcomes in Alliance with the non-queer beer drinkers union and the drivers of the right side of the road organization hereby declare that they have been victimized by the NAU demonstrators organizations and demand a repayment of taxes for the months paid while they were and are in attendance. A “NO TACO FOR YOU” strike!!! Will begin immediately!!

  18. Damn, thought they went to school to get an education. Guess not so much. Spoiled little brats what needed their parents to be a parent and not a buddy. My dad would have kicked my ass if I would have done that. Grow up kids, there is a real world out there and being a protester and a victim won’t get you very far. Doesn’t look good on a resume. But then what the hell, you will grow up to be part of the proud 48% living off the government won’t you. Hate to tell you that won’t last that long either. The US is basically broke.

Comments are closed.