Fiesta Bowl Scandal Did Not Change Arizona Legislators’ Free Ticket Perk

When they are not doling out free tickets, Arizona’s state universities leaders woo legislators on their turf. ASU President Michael Crow, ousted regent Greg Patterson, and Sparky lobby legislators on the Capitol lawn. Ticket for today’s ASU | UofA game are going for no less than $100.

Despite the blustery demands for reforms in the wake of the Fiesta Bowl scandal in 2011, little changed for Arizona politicians and the special interests who lobby them. As a result, Arizona legislators have regularly been offered, and have accepted, tickets to the three state universities’ athletic events for free.

So on Saturday, while Arizona’s cash-strapped families figure out a way to get in front of cable television to watch the UofA Wildcats take on the ASU Sun Devils, some Arizona legislators will take in the game gratis.

According to a March 2012, press release from the FBI, “The former executive director of the Fiesta Bowl has admitted his role in the making of illegal federal campaign contributions by the bowl.  He admitted that while serving as the Fiesta Bowl’s executive director, he conspired with others to solicit political campaign contributions from Fiesta Bowl employees and to later reimburse those employees in the guise of employee bonuses. Although Junker acknowledged that he knew that making campaign contributions in the name of others was illegal, he nonetheless instructed Natalie Wisneski, the Fiesta Bowl’s chief operating officer, to use bonuses to reimburse employees for their contributions.”

The scandal involved Junker “directing reimbursement of approximately $25,000 in contributions made to federal election campaigns between 2006 and 2009, and additional amounts made to the campaigns of state and local candidates. Tax returns were filed with the IRS for the 2007 and 2008 tax years, which falsely reported that the not-for-profit Fiesta Bowl made no contributions to political campaigns and engaged in no lobbying activities,” according to the FBI.

In 2011, the Arizona Capitol Times reported that the Fiesta Bowl scandal involved “28 lawmakers, four other elected officials, a lobbying firm and a lobbyist.” The Arizona Capitol Times report included Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery’s call for an “overhaul the state’s lobbying laws” which he thought should include an “outright ban” on gifts.

In 2011, it was “against the law for lawmakers to accept gifts – including game tickets – unless they are offered to the entire Legislature, one of its full chambers, or a committee,” reported the Arizona Capitol Times. “Lawmakers also must annually report gifts if they exceed $500.”

In 2012, then-House Minority Leader Chad Campbell released his Government Transparency and Accountability Plan. Included in the plan were “steps that the democrats would favor “to restore public confidence in Arizona’s state government” after the bi-partisan Fiesta Bowl scandal.

But nothing changed according to legislators. The universities can still give away tickets as long as they offer them to all legislators.

Some legislators like Rep. Rosanna Gabaldon, a democrat out of LD2, are more eager to snatch them up than others. Emails produced in response to a records request by the Arizona Daily Independent in its investigation of a “trade mission” to Mexico earlier this year, show that Gabaldon is a fan of the Wildcats.

According to the Census Bureau, the median household income is $46,162, and the per capita income is $25,729, for the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area. The median household income is $54,229 and the per capita income is $27,832 in Maricopa County.

Arizona legislators earn approximately $24,000/year for a part-time job. They receive “$35/day in per deim pay for the first 120 days of the regular session and for special sessions and $10/day thereafter. Members residing outside Maricopa County receive an additional $25/day for the first 120 days of the regular session and for special sessions and an additional $10/day thereafter.”

At a rate of approximately $24,000 for 120 days, legislators’ annual pay would be approximately $72,000 plus. Given that many legislators also hold jobs and/or own businesses, and perform duties associated with their jobs or businesses during the Legislative Session, their income is considerably higher than most of their constituents.

[polldaddy poll=9882845]

Most of their constituents aren’t offered free tickets and meals. Unless of course, you count the meager meals they buy with food stamps.

When the ADI asked a couple of legislators, off the record, if they accepted freebies to the games, one told us that he had accepted tickets in order to “show his support for the universities.” When we asked if purchasing tickets wouldn’t be a better way to show support, he did not respond.

While Rep. Gabaldon is sure to enjoy the game today, there are countless kids and parents in her district, who do not have the same opportunity.

But it isn’t just the universities’ sporting events that legislators have access to.

Check back Monday for more.

7 Comments

  1. From the pathetically weak Arizona legislature code of ethics.

    A. No member shall:
    1. Intentionally solicit, accept or agree to accept from any source, whether directly or indirectly and whether by himself or through any other person, any personal financial benefit, including any gift for himself or another, upon an agreement or understanding that his vote, opinion, judgment, exercise of discretion or other action as a public official will thereby be influenced.

    THE LAST 24 WORDS MAKE A JOKE OF THIS STATEMENT OF ETHICS. OF COURSE THE TICKETS (GIFTS) ARE GIVEN TO CREATE AN ATMOSPHERE OF EXPECTING SUPPORT. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK THE PUBLIC IS. THE PUBLIC IS GUILTY OF UNFOUNDED TRUST.

  2. Observations about elected Legislators:

    Before being elect they were normal people after election they become possessed with super human intellect and are knowledgeable on all subjects.

    After election they are entitled to partake in what ever perks offered by Lobbyists and influential constituents.

    Suddenly are able to rationalize behavior that previously was unacceptable.

    Considered themselves underpaid, although their compensation for four months work has long been public knowledge. Consequently they deserve whatever perks offered.

    Deserve more respect than before election.

  3. From the smallest tadpoles to the mighty alligator, the legislative cesspool of the swamp is alive and well teaming with life.
    The swamp rats are most assuredly entitled to free perks, just ask them.
    We need the local version of the Donald to drain Phoenix. Of course this is the job of the free press but since they are above the law the ignorant Lilliputians are fed lies and kept in the dark.

    The Oracle

  4. The only thing that I can say as an ex-firefighter (you know a municipal employee) that assisted specking fire equipment and trucks, etc. if I took even as much as a ball hat from a vendor I most likely would have been suspended or fired. What the hell, politicians aren’t held to the same standard as municipal employees? Gee, wonder why? Privileged asses one and all. Kind of threw up in my mouth a little when I read this article. And you think the entire political system isn’t broken, you are sadly mistaken. Just smaller swamp creatures on the local and state levels that live under the pond scum.

Comments are closed.