Are Warren, King, Kirkpatrick Guilty Of Inappropriate Appropriation?

Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Tucson, in a 2016 file photo. (Photo by Gage Skidmore/Creative Commons)

By James T. Harris & Yolanda Weinberger

What do you call it when people of a certain race deny their own background in order to appropriate another’s culture, lay claim to another’s history, or otherwise assume another’s identity? If you’re a person of color, it’s called self-loathing. If you’re a Republican, it’s called opportunistic. If you’re Elizabeth Warren, former Arizona Congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick, Rachel Dolezal, or Shaun King, it isn’t called anything. In fact, it’s completely overlooked. Given the known hazards associated with assuming, what would drive these white folk to not be who they really are? They might try to pass it off as empathy, but empathy is walking a mile in someone’s shoes NOT stealing them.

We’ll tell you what we suspect the motive is: they are progressive con-artists running a con. They can’t sell their liberal bull shiggity in the package they were born in, so they have to be someone else in order for the con to work.

Even if it is a one drop rule of someone else. You see, there was a time when the one drop rule was used to marginalize a race and keep the majority powerful race pure from any desecration. Now, not only is the one drop rule only used when it garners political or social power (think of a person who’s equally white and black choosing to be black for street credibility, or entertainment power or votes – we’re not naming names here. You’re already thinking of people). The people we mentioned above have gone all out in their appropriation. No drop needed!

Rachel Dolezal headed up the NAACP in her community, Sean King (a white dude) skewers his own people as a Black Lives Matters warrior. Ann Kirkpatrick launches her campaign in Arizona by appropriating the native tongue of the Apache, and in the case of Pocahontas, aka Elizabeth Warren, she even went so far as to plagiarize Native American recipes to sell herself as a pow wow attendee.

That’s real devotion.

The problem as we see it is liberals have created an anti-white culture, so now they have to fake minority status in order to advance their narrative. Stop and think about that. In order to sustain liberalism white folks are appropriating brown culture to achieve victim status so that other white folk who suffer from white-guilt will advance the agenda.

Our heads hurt.

The irony is that these changlings are collectively sending a message to society that it is not okay to ‘be who you is.’ According to the way they run the con, unless you can claim some protected status, you have no status at all. And that is the message they are sending to our society.

As followers of Jesus and parents – parents of kids, who happen to be members of a protected class – we didn’t raise our kids to seek protection or believe that the color of their skin was more important than the content of their character. As truth seekers and parents, we recognized the importance of teaching them the inherent value of all God’s children. Progressive con artist snake oil salesmen like those culture appropriators generally don’t value God enough to value his children – all of them.

In essence, Warren, Kirkpatrick et.al firmly believe that our kids are not children of God as much as they are tools for the cause. The liberalism is rooted in hatred.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a friend.” He was right, but I might add: “Hate is the only force capable of transforming a child into a tool.”

The cause isn’t equal opportunity, it is not equal access, and it is certainly not “social justice.” It is a quest for power and control. Why else would someone change their ethnicity but spew the same garbage ideology? Because they can’t control their little brown brothers and sisters and their bench is shallow. Hence Lie-a-watha Warren. You get me Shaun “Anything but Dr. Martin Luther” King? Pronto Squanto! What a world.