From Tillman Talk To Economic Impact, Nike’s Kaepernick Deal Sparks Debate

The late Pat Tillman, left, shown with his brother Kevin, has been a topic of debate at the Pro Football Hall of Fame regarding whether he should be enshrined there. (Photo courtesy Pat Tillman Foundation)

By Christopher Roth

PHOENIX – He just did it.

Colin Kaepernick may never suit up for another NFL game, but that hasn’t stopped him from being the center of debate.

This time, it is as the face of Nike’s 30th anniversary celebration of its “Just Do It” marketing campaign. The ad includes a close-up of Kaepernick’s face and the words “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”

Some have questioned Nike’s marketing savvy. Others have interjected the late Pat Tillman into the conversation.

The former San Francisco 49ers quarterback ignited a national discussion in 2016 when he sat during the playing of the national anthem before a 49ers game. Later, after consulting with a military veteran, he decided to kneel during the anthem instead.

Kaepernick said he wanted to bring awareness to incidents of police brutality against people of color. His critics saw it differently, accusing Kaepernick and other NFL players who joined him, of disrespecting the flag and military veterans.

It has ignited a debate, but not the one that Kaepernick had in mind.

In March 2017, he opted out of his contract with the 49ers, and no other NFL team has signed him. He is suing the league with his attorneys arguing that NFL owners have colluded to keep him out of the league.

In March, Nike and the NFL announced they had agreed to a contract extension through 2028 worth more than $1 billion. And with Nike serving as a supplier of NFL gear and apparel, the campaign leaves the league in an awkward position.

Kenneth Shropshire, CEO of the Global Sport Institute and adidas Distinguished Professor of Global Sport at Arizona State, calls Nike’s move a shrewd one. (Photo by Cronkite News)

However, it is a message consistent with Nike’s history of controversial branding, such as its “I’m not your role model” ads featuring Charles Barkley and an “If you let me play” campaign built around the impact of Title IX on women’s sports.

“It was a shrewd move by Nike to go with an athlete not currently playing who conflicts with most of the messaging the NFL is sending out,” said Kenneth Shropshire, CEO of the Global Sport Institute and adidas Distinguished Professor of Global Sport at Arizona State.

“Nike has a reputation of sticking by its athletes during trying times. It took them awhile to cut ties with Lance Armstrong, and they eventually came back to Michael Vick.”

As part of Nike’s deal with the former 49ers quarterback, the shoe and apparel giant will donate funds to Kaepernick’s “Know Your Rights” campaign.

Shropshire and other experts on sports and society will be watching closely as the story unfolds.

“Only time will tell if it was a smart move by Nike, in such a competitive market,” Shropshire said. “With companies like adidas competing for market share, this impact may not be felt immediately.”

Public reaction was swift on social media. And Nike stock slipped more than 2 ½ percent Tuesday, the first day of trading after the campaign debuted.

The controversy also has brought the name of former ASU and Arizona Cardinals standout Pat Tillman into the discussion. Tillman walked away from a lucrative contract with the Cardinals to enlist in the elite Army Rangers after 9/11. He was killed in 2004 by friendly fire in Afghanistan.

Critics of Kaepernick and Nike have invoked Tillman as an example of someone who made the ultimate sacrifice for something he believed in.

Stephen Miller of Fox News tweeted, “Just putting it out there that Pat Tillman sacrificed just a *bit more than Colin Kaepernick.”

Jeremy Staat, a veteran and Tillman’s former ASU teammate, believes Nike and those who would use Tillman to make their argument are mistaken.

“Nike has it wrong,” Staat said. “Kaepernick didn’t give up everything. He still has plenty of money in the bank, and he is probably making more now than he did playing football.”

However, he said Tillman would have been there with Kaepernick to protest injustice.

“Pat is not who the media has made him out to be,” he said. “Pat would have taken a knee. … Kaepernick is not protesting the flag, he is protesting police brutality.”

The Nike story blew up just as the NFL and its players were wrangling over the anthem situation, with the league mandating discipline for players who protest.

The NFL and Nike are bracing for ramifications. Some people have already starting burning Nike apparel in protest. Others have announced on social media that they will buy Nike products in a show of support for the company and Kaepernick.

Despite remaining out of the league since leaving the 49ers, Kaepernick’s jersey ranked 39th in sales last season and the debate will continue as NFL regular season kicks off Thursday when Atlanta Falcons visit the defending Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles.

5 Comments

  1. The Nike is now doubling down with an opening day advertisement with the “K” as the feature speaker… works for me, won’t be watching the games this year, will “never again” buy another set of NIKE shoes.. they are done. Capitalism is marvelous is it not.

  2. Kaepernick’s whole self-promotional show is foolish and misguided:

    1. The flag represents our country and its people. What does it have to do with police “brutality”?

    2. Police Departments (and police oversight) are local.

    3. Although there are a few glaring cases of police shooting unarmed suspects of all races
    seemingly without provocation, the media has blantantly lied to make some fatal shootings seem intentional. It is a fiction that Michael Brown was an innocent who was surrendering. That was debunked by black witnesses. There is video of Brown strong-arm robbing cigars from a small Asian shopkeeper. Brown was also high, which might explain why he would charge a police-officer who was holding a gun. He was only a teen and it’s a shame he lost his life, but the officer was the one who suffered because of Brown’s bad behavior.

    4. Certainly people have a right to protest, but if they do it on the job, their employers
    have a right to fire them.

  3. Capitalism — ya gotta love it! See a need and fill it. See a market and pitch your product to it. What Nike’s move tells me is that they see a big enough market of people who believe in human rights, in minority rights, who reject racism and embrace those who stand up to it, even at the cost of their jobs. I’m glad Kaepernick got the deal, since the NFL has blacklisted him…but, truth be told, I’m a Crocs kind of guy.

    • Capitalizm – you have to love it.. nope you don’t – seems socialism is on it’s way in. Your comment ” a big enough market of people who believe in human rights, in minority rights, who reject racism and embrace those who stand up to it” reminds me of the question, ‘when are you going to stop beating your wife’.. implying guilt regardless of answer.. oh if you don’t like Nike or “Mr.K”, Nike actions your a racist? against human rights and of course all minorities… a true Kaepernickist you are sir. I don’t need to know “K”s political leanings, just play football, don’t need to know who he votes for, just play football. Like Linda Ronstadt – Bruce Springsteen and others who have interjected their views into my time and my ticket price.. NO THANKS just sing the tunes.. rock and roll – but no they just felt compelled to open their mouth and opinion both gone as is “K” and now Nike is willing to spill their “$’s” in the billions.. The Football game is no longer on my TV, nor are the advertisers. I like football, we have a family member in the hall of fame.. it’s only a game now tainted by “K”nik too bad. The NoFanLeague will be in trouble soon. Gotta love capitalism.

Comments are closed.