The Anti-Religious Bigotry of Democrats

The focus of Senators Diane Feinstein and Dick Durbin on the religious faith of Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor nominated to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh District, was clearly anti-religious bigotry by two Marxist secular Senators in the Democratic Party.

Democrats zeroed in on whether Barrett’s personal views would override her legal judgment. I thought this anti-religious bigotry ended with the election of John F. Kennedy. Apparently not.

It is now time to focus on the Marxist dogma of Democrats and whether their favorable personal views of Marxism override their oath of office. The Marxist dogma lives loudly within Democrats.

“People of faith, whatever faith they may hold, should not be disqualified because of that faith from serving the public good,” commented Archbishop William E. Lori, chairman of the Catholic Bishop’s committee on religious liberty. But, if Democrats ignore Archbishop’s comment, then Democrats should be prevented from running for and holding office because of the Marxist dogma living loud within them.

Marxism is antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and Americanism. Marxists hate the limitations the Constitution places on government, which is why Democrats attempt to neutralize the Constitution through regulation and case law determined by Marxist leaning judges. Very simply, who would you trust more, a religious judge (regardless of religion) or a Marxist leaning judge who believes in a totalitarian philosophy?

What does a group of Marxist leaning judges look like? Gander a view of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit where 87% of its decisions between 2010-2015 were reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court; or the 11th Circuit where 85% of its decision were reverse by the U.S. Supreme Court during the same period; or the Ninth Circuit, where 79% of its cases were reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 2014, the Second Circuit had a reversal rate of 100%. It can’t get much worse than that.

The bigotry and dishonesty of Senators Feinstein and Durbin display a level of intolerance and hate symptomatic of far left Marxist stalwarts. Senator Bernie Sanders, a true blue Marxist, always has a religious litmus test for Trump Christian nominees, stating about nominee for deputy White House budget director Russell Vought that “this nominee is really not someone who this country is supposed to be about.” I suggest that the likes of Sanders, Feinstein and Durbin are not what our country is all about. These three Senators do not represent who Americans are.

The religious litmus test of the anti-religious left is really a litmus test on abortion and same-sex marriage. Let’s turn the tables around. Let’s question a Democratic judicial nominee and use the Marxist dogma as a litmus test . Does this judicial nominee favor abortion over life? Disqualified. Does this judicial nominee favor same-sex marriage over religious liberty? Disqualified. This is what the left is attempting to do to Republican judicial nominees.

Senator Durbin also attacked the religious faith of U.S. Court of Appeals Judge William Pryor and Chief Justice John Roberts, both Catholics. This is the same Senator Durbin that attempted to throw black children out of charter schools in Washington, D.C., as a favor to the teachers’ union. An attempt that was patently racist.

Richard Brinkley

Here’s the rub. Senator Durbin, self-professed Catholic, is questioning the loyalty to the Constitution of multiple judges who clearly have demonstrated their faithfulness to the law.  One has to wonder how he goes to confession based on his hypocritical double standard? Maybe he is a heretic Catholic.

It appears that Marxist Democrats keep forgetting the Constitution they swore to uphold. Article VI states in part “. . . no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”


  1. And you expect more from these people? Why, they have been like this for years. Intolerance runs deep in both parties, especially the Democrat party. No Christians are allowed, but all of the socialists are welcome. George Soros says so.

    • Just an observation, but every time I see Sen.Feinstein she looks more and more like Dr. Zira the chimpanzee psychologist & veterinarian in the Planet of the Apes. Zira was played by actress Kim Hunter.

      The Oracle

  2. One must keep in mind that many of the Catholic prelates in the US are in the back pocket of the Left and, with the blessing of the Pope, more than happy to push/lead us into Marxist, fascist, socialist (anything but Democratic) government.

    • ‘the pope’, the last pope? the socialist pope? the pope that thinks he can bring about a socialist religion of globalists – now that is a dangerous think – but we are watching this happen in Rome right now. Look back into the history of this pope – his ties to Russia and Poland in recent history – his ties and power in overthrow of his predecessor and what happen there in the catholic church. Quite a story.

  3. Christians – will soon be called the haters – the problem – to be disdained – much like the Jews of Germany ; they will be killed, coming in your near term lifetime to and in this nation.

    • Not a chance with 5 trillion bullets own by the American citizens. I wouldn’t worry too much about the haters of Christianity living in the U.S. during the next civil war.

  4. Yet if you support the Bill of Rights i.e. the 2d amendment they also claim you are not qualified to be anything. Just look at what they did in last SC nomination process. The left ois so far gone its not funny, yet the idiots love them as they think they are taking care of them. They never heard of a Hand UP only Hand OUTS.

  5. Did Senators Feinstein and Durbin miss the part in the Constitution prohibiting ANY “religious test” of public officials or do they believe their personal views override the constitution or were they just engaging in bigoted thinking out loud? Presumably their good buds Senators Flake and McCain agree with this bigotry and why hasn`t the entire Senate called for condemnation of these bigots?

  6. Here is my problem with the hearing. Why did the chairman of the hearings NOT step up to the plate and remind Feinstein and Durbin that what they are asking is unconstitutional and not allowed?
    Is he a Marxist as well. This is not the first time these type of errors have been made.
    Seems to me the Sargent of Arms needs to be standing by with the rule book and throw the the red flag when these Marxist so called leaders step out of line and set them straight right then. That would really look great on national TV. And if that upsets them so be it. Apparently, Feinstein, “Dr. Zera”, good one Oracle, and Durbin think they are above the law and the Constitution. I wonder if they have actually ever read it.

  7. the spaghetti on the wall is difficult to take off one strand at a time without pulling down the entire wall or sections of it – it’s why ACA law was written as it was in 10,000 pages, of we don’t know what’s in it till we pass it, yeah and then it’s to late!… the laws intertwined with rules, if dislike a rule, you need to pass a law to change it, that is why the total and complete disillusion of the ACA is required to fix anything, the intertwined ACA laws effect Medicare in rule – the pasta was thrown at the wall to see what sticks – more is on the way to land on top of that – soon Marxist law rules ; that is the leftist agenda ; overthrow by delusion and confusion. Don’t allow it, or die by it.

Comments are closed.