Climate Madness 2

The following are recent articles from various sources that deal with global warming. They illustrate how corrupt “climate science” is today and how it is almost purely political rather than scientific. Some stories are amusing, others are ominous.

We start with my favorite: a paper where the authors are exercised that there are too few female glaciologists:

Climate Craziness of the Week: ‘feminist glaciology’ in the climate change context
report by Anthony Watts

Paper title: Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research

Abstract from the publication Progress in Human Geography:

Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions. Read more from Watts and read Comments by William Briggs

The four authors, from the University of Oregon, demonstrate the state of political correctness in academia. How do they get funding for this type of research? Maybe:

Academics ‘regularly lie to get research grants’
By David Matthews

Academics routinely lie and exaggerate when telling funding agencies what impact their research will have, a series of candid interviews with scholars in the UK and Australia has suggested.

Their dismissive comments about the “charade” of impact statements brings to light what appears to be an open secret in academia – that academics simply do not take such projections seriously. A new study anonymously interviewed 50 senior academics from two research-intensive universities – one in the UK and one in Australia – who had experience writing “pathways to impact” (PIS) statements, as they are called in the UK, and in some cases had also reviewed such statements. It was normal to sensationalise and embellish impact claims, the study published in Studies in Higher Education found. Read more

Next, our Attorney General forgets about the First Amendment:

Attorney General Lynch Looks Into Prosecuting ‘Climate Change Deniers’
by Hans von Spakovsky, Daily Signal

In news that should shock and anger Americans, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that not only has she discussed internally the possibility of pursuing civil actions against so-called “climate change deniers,” but she has “referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action.” Read more

Brainwashed children and their lawyers:

Kids sue Obama for violating their constitutional ‘climate change’ rights
by Thomas Richard, Examiner.com

Backed by an environmental group and climate activist James Hansen, 21 kids appeared in an Oregon District Court on Wednesday, part of a lawsuit against President Obama for encouraging the use of fossil fuels. They also claim this is leading to increased global warming, which is a violation of their constitutional rights. Similar to a suit that was filed last summer in Massachusetts, in which the judge threw out the case, the children aged 8 to 19 seek to hold “President Obama and various federal agencies responsible for continued fossil fuel exploitation” and the “alleged failure to prevent the harmful impact of climate change.” Read more

The best laid plans:

Climate Craziness of the Week: Pumping sea level rise away onto Antarctica
by Anthony Watts

From the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Future sea-level rise is a problem probably too big to be solved even by unprecedented geo-engineering such as pumping water masses onto the Antarctic continent. The idea has been investigated by scientists at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact. While the pumped water would certainly freeze to solid ice, the weight of it would speed up the ice-flow into the ocean at the Antarctic coast. To store the water for a millennium, it would have to be pumped at least 700 kilometer inland, the team found. Overall that would require more than one tenth of the present annual global energy supply to balance the current rate of sea-level rise. Read more (The Potsdam Institute is noted for its climate alarmism.)

More political correctness instead of science:

Science Is Turning Back To The Dark Ages
by Melanie Phillips, London Times

According to a new study, scientists’ claims that coral reefs are doomed by ocean acidification are overplayed. An “inherent bias” in scientific journals, says the editor of ICES Journal of Marine Science, has excluded research showing marine creatures are not being damaged.

Instead, he says, many studies have used flawed methods by subjecting such creatures to sudden increases in carbon dioxide that would never happen in real life. No surprises there. The claim that CO2 emissions are acidifying the oceans is a favourite of climate-change alarmists.

Man-made global warming theory has been propped up by studies that many scientists have dismissed as methodologically flawed, ideologically bent or even fraudulent. The problem of scientific integrity, however, goes far wider. Psychology, neuroscience, physics and other scientific areas have been convulsed by revelations of dodgy research. Source

If you don’t like the facts, then make up your own:

The Doctored Science Of Global Warming

Washington Times editorial

Pure science undertaken for science’s own sake is as rare as a rainbow. It’s certainly scarce in Washington, where the quest for knowledge is vulnerable to the bias of politics. Skeptics of President Obama’s climate change agenda say they see new evidence of fraud. If administration officials are colluding with scientists to cook the evidence, such as it might be, to demonstrate that the planet is warming, the skeptics deserve everyone’s thanks.

Whistleblowers within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) complained last year that a major study by agency researcher Thomas Karl, refuting evidence of a pause in global warming, had been rushed to publication. The implication was that the study was coordinated with Obama administration officials to add to the urgency of the president’s climate change agenda in advance of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris. Republicans on the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology issued a subpoena of records of NOAA communications dealing with the study. Read more

The next three stories result from increasing dependence in Europe and UK on undependable wind and solar energy which are raising electricity rates.

Green Madness I: High UK Energy Costs Could Force Steel Work Overseas
by Ben Glaze, The Mirror, (London)

A steel firm is threatening to move key equipment and jobs abroad – blaming Britain’s sky-high energy costs. The owners of Liberty Steel could shift production to India or the US – depriving the UK of up to 3,000 jobs, including a thousand highly-skilled posts in the struggling sector. The Gupta Family Group wants to move equipment from a former steelworks in Kent to its plant in South Wales. But the company warned the current cost of energy and insecurity of supply could delay the project and force it to move the factory overseas. Read more

Green Madness II: Households Face Higher Energy Bills To Keep The Lights
By Emily Gosden, The Telegraph (London)

Households face paying hundreds of millions of pounds in extra levies on their energy bills, under new plans to ensure Britain has enough power plants to keep the lights on. Amber Rudd, the energy secretary, unveiled plans to overhaul a crucial subsidy scheme that is designed to maintain secure electricity supplies, amid fears it was failing and could leave the UK at risk of blackouts.

The “capacity market” scheme is already due to run in winter 2018-19 and 2019-20, when energy firms will be paid almost £1 billion in subsidies each year to guarantee their coal, gas and nuclear power plants will be running. The payments will be funded through levies on energy bills, adding about £10 a year to a typical household electricity bill. Read more

Green Madness III: European Subsidies to Chinese Industries

Global Warming Policy Forum

Chinese wind turbine and solar manufacturers are increasingly dominant in the world markets, something that the EU did not fully anticipate when drawing up its policies. Indeed, in 2008, in modeling the impact of the Renewables Directive of 2009 its consultants dismissed as unlikely the “pessimistic export” scenario for Europe’s wind and solar industries. This was questionable at the time, and now appears to be a serious mistake. Read more

And in the U.S.:

$50 Million Renewable Energy Scam
by Eric Worrall

A Pennsylvania newspaper has reported details of a $50 million alleged renewable energy scam. More shocking is how easy it was, to allegedly defraud government subsidies. A $50 million local fraud case might not seem a big deal, but it should concern US taxpayers that there are other cases. Once fraudsters find an easily exploited systemic weakness, the situation can rapidly escalate. In 2010, Denmark lost 2% of their GDP, seven billion dollars, to out of control carbon credit fraud.

In this case, all the alleged criminals had to do, to get their hands on $50 million of federal money, was submit some paperwork, and find an engineer who was happy to pocket a fee without doing any work.

Read more

Finally a message from the “do as I say, not as I do” department:
By Chris Deaton, Weekly Standard

Obama’s Carbon Admission: ‘I Have the World’s Largest Carbon Footprint’

President Obama once “ruefully” admitted to staff that he personally is the planet’s largest source of carbon emissions, according to an anecdote published in The Atlantic. That’s because of all his traveling. Read more

See also:

Global Warming – The Madness of our Age

The Bankruptcy of Climate Science

Note to readers: I have constructed a linked index to more than 400 of my ADI articles. You can see it at: https://wryheat.wordpress.com/adi-index/

You can read my comprehensive, 28-page essay on climate change here: http://wp.me/P3SUNp-1bq

5 Comments on "Climate Madness 2"

  1. I love the front page of Newsweek I think it was back in the 70’s that proclaimed GLOBAL COOLING with a picture of a blizzard and deep snow in the background.

    It’s a political scam folks, the largest planet scam ever perpetrated on the worlds population, and now that these commies can’t get things their way, they wanna force you to comply and agree.

    Live free or die

  2. Climate change – becoming one of the stepping stones to globalization population control – and I’d use that last word in it’s purist sense. These guys are dead serious about ‘control’ of you – down to the point of ending you to end opposition… just over the horizon of the time in which we live.

  3. Pimacan2. I vividly remember that magazine cover. I was in Ohio, having lunch and while reading that depressing article I thought, “Geez, it is already so cold, that is going to stink.” Glad they were wrong then and wrong now, always wrong.

  4. David Finley | March 16, 2016 at 10:47 am |

    All you need to know is how the political parties are acting as they lose control. Both parties. They have spent and lied us into oblivion.

    This country’s people are resilient and will find a way to regain control.

    Elect Donald Trump and let’s get started.

  5. Wry in Tucson | March 16, 2016 at 12:28 pm |

    Call me a denier, but I think this climate change thing is nonsense. I don’t believe in it, I don’t believe in climate either. It’s just a way for the so-call experts to avoid taking responsibility for their bad weather forecasts. In fact I don’t believe in weather. They call rain weather, they call snow weather, they call fog weather. But they can’t all be weather. Weather doesn’t exist.

Comments are closed.