Election 2018: Know Your Judges

The Arizona Judicial Performance Review (JPR) Commission has released its official findings on judicial performance for each judge whose name will appear on the General Election Ballot.

The Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review, is a constitutionally created commission comprised of public members, attorneys, and judges, evaluates each of these judges and provides information so voters can make informed decisions.

This Commission asks attorneys, jurors, litigants, witnesses, and other people who have appeared before these judges to complete a survey on the judge’s legal ability, integrity, judicial temperament, and other attributes. The Commission reviews this data and other public input, and then votes on whether a judge “meets” or “does not meet” judicial performance standards.

The Commission publishes its findings in the Secretary of State’s Publicity Pamphlet, which is mailed to each voter household. Judges matter. Read the Judicial Performance Report before voting:

Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Anderson, Arthur T. Meets JPR Standards 22 1
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 77% n/a n/a
Integrity 89% n/a 95%
Communications 78% n/a 89%
Temperament 79% n/a 92%
Admin Performance 65% n/a 87%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Astrowsky, Bradley Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 96% 100% 97%
Communications 98% 99% 100%
Temperament 92% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 99% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bachus, Alison Meets JPR Standards 20 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% n/a 90%
Communications 96% n/a 88%
Temperament 91% n/a 79%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 89%
Settlement Activities 80% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bailey, Cynthia Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 81%
Communications 98% n/a 81%
Temperament 96% n/a 75%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 92%
Settlement Activities 95% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Barton, Janet E. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
Integrity n/a n/a 95%
Communications n/a n/a 94%
Temperament n/a n/a 92%
Admin Performance n/a n/a 95%
Admin Skills n/a n/a 92%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bergin, Dawn M. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 100%
Communications 95% n/a 100%
Temperament 95% n/a 100%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 100%
Settlement Activities 97% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bergin, Jeffrey T. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 95% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communications 98% 100% 100%
Temperament 100% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 99% 100% 100%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Blair, Michael Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 95% n/a 71%
Communications 98% n/a 79%
Temperament 99% n/a 77%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 95%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bolick, Clint Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a
Integrity 100% n/a
Communications 97% n/a
Temperament 98% n/a
Admin Performance 100% n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Bostwick, Janet Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 94% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communications 97% 100% 100%
Temperament 97% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 90% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 89% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Brain, Mark Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 94%
Communication 99% 100% 95%
Temperament 97% 100% 95%
Admin Performance 99% 100% 95%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Brodman, Roger E. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Browning, Christopher C. Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 92% 100% 87%
Communication 84% 100% 83%
Temperament 85% 100% 83%
Admin Performance 93% 100% 88%
Settlement Activities 83% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Campagnolo, Theodore Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 90% n/a n/a
Integrity 96% n/a 90%
Communication 92% n/a 83%
Temperament 95% n/a 81%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 88%
Settlement Activities 95% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Chon-Lopez, Javier Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 93% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 96%
Communication 95% n/a 91%
Temperament 93% n/a 88%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 95%
Settlement Activities 95% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Como, Gregory Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communication 100% 100% 100%
Temperament 98% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 100% 99% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Cooper, Katherine Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 95% n/a 75%
Communication 100% n/a 68%
Temperament 97% n/a 70%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 73%
Settlement Activities 91% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Crawford, Janice K. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 95% n/a n/a
Integrity 94% n/a 100%
Communication 96% n/a 100%
Temperament 94% n/a 98%
Admin Performance 95% n/a 99%
Settlement Activities 85% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Culbertson, Kristin Meets JPR Standards 20 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 84%
Communication 87% n/a 69%
Temperament 80% n/a 73%
Admin Performance 96% n/a 72%
Settlement Activities 93% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Cunanan, David O. Meets JPR Standards 23 0
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Duncan, Sally S. Meets JPR Standards 22 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 91% n/a n/a
Integrity 95% n/a 96%
Communication 66% n/a 85%
Temperament 55% n/a 74%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 94%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Eckerstrom, Peter J. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 84% 98%
Integrity 98% 100%
Communication 100% n/a
Temperament 100% n/a
Admin Performance 98% 100%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Espinosa, Philip G. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 82% 91%
Integrity 98% 94%
Communication 100% n/a
Temperament n/a n/a
Admin Performance 97% 87%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Fink, Dean M. Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 72%
Communication 99% 100% 76%
Temperament 96% 100% 84%
Admin Performance 98% 100% 82%
Settlement Activities 97% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Fish, Geoffrey Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 71%
Communication 98% n/a 84%
Temperament 96% n/a 66%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 83%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Foster Jr., George H. Meets JPR Standards 23 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 89% n/a n/a
Integrity 89% 100% 98%
Communication 89% 100% 100%
Temperament 82% 100% 96%
Admin Performance 85% 99% 100%
Settlement Activities 89% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Fox, Dewain Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 86%
Communication 100% n/a 94%
Temperament 100% n/a 74%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 83%
Settlement Activities 94% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Fuller, Steven Meets JPR Standards 19 4
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% 100% 100%
Communication 100% 100% 100%
Temperament 85% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 95% 100% 98%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Granville, Warren J. Meets JPR Standards 22 1
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communication 100% 100% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 98% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 99% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Green, Jennifer E. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 98% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 97%
Communication 94% n/a 95%
Temperament 97% n/a 95%
Admin Performance 97% n/a 94%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Harrington, Charles V. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% n/a 98%
Communication 94% n/a 88%
Temperament 92% n/a 94%
Admin Performance 95% n/a 97%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Hegyi, Hugh E. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a n/a
Communication 100% n/a n/a
Temperament 100% n/a n/a
Admin Performance 100% n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Herrod, Michael Meets JPR Standards 27 0
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Integrity 99% n/a 86%
Communication 99% n/a 83%
Temperament 100% n/a 87%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 86%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Hochuli, Peter Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% n/a 100%
Communication 98% n/a 100%
Temperament 97% n/a 100%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 100%
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Hopkins, Stephen Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 98%
Communication 94% n/a 93%
Temperament 97% n/a 96%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 99%
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Kreamer, Joseph C. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 90% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 95%
Communication 99% n/a 98%
Temperament 97% n/a 96%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 96%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Kuhn, Cynthia Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communication 100% 100% 100%
Temperament 97% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 100% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 93% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
LeMaire, Kerstin Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 86% n/a n/a
Integrity 95% 100% 100%
Communication 87% 100% 100%
Temperament 91% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 88% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 75% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Liwski, Danelle B. Meets JPR Standards 26 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 91% n/a n/a
Integrity 96% 100% 100%
Communication 94% 100% 100%
Temperament 93% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 99% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Marner, James E. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 98%
Communication 96% n/a 100%
Temperament 92% n/a 96%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 100%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Martin, Daniel G. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% 100% 100%
Communication 97% 100% 100%
Temperament 96% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 95% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 89% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Moskowitz, Frank Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 98% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 95%
Communication 100% n/a 96%
Temperament 99% n/a 93%
Admin Performance 96% n/a 93%
Settlement Activities 90% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Mroz, Rosa P. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% 100% 100%
Communication 97% 100% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 100% 99% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Myers, Samuel J. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a n/a
Communication 98% n/a n/a
Temperament 99% n/a n/a
Admin Performance 98% n/a n/a
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Neal, Delia Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 100%
Communication 97% n/a 100%
Temperament 91% n/a 100%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 100%
Settlement Activities 86% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
O’Connor, Karen L. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 89% n/a n/a
Integrity 93% n/a 97%
Communication 90% n/a 92%
Temperament 93% n/a 94%
Admin Performance 90% n/a 90%
Settlement Activities 93% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Otis, Erin O’Brien Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 98% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% 100% 100%
Communication 99% 100% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 97% 98% 100%
Settlement Activities 95% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Pelander John Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% 100%
Integrity 100% 100%
Communication 98% n/a
Temperament 99% n/a
Admin Performance 100% 100%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Pineda, Susanna C. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 94%
Communication 98% n/a 92%
Temperament 100% n/a 94%
Admin Performance 90% n/a 92%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Polk, Jay Meets JPR Standards 27 0
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Quigley, Kathleen Meets JPR Standards 26 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 99%
Communication 98% n/a 98%
Temperament 99% n/a 98%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 99%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Rea, John C. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 94% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 99%
Communication 99% 100% 90%
Temperament 100% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 100% 100% 98%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Reckart, Laura Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 93% n/a n/a
Integrity 93% n/a 98%
Communication 91% n/a 100%
Temperament 92% n/a 97%
Admin Performance 93% n/a 96%
Settlement Activities 92% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Rogers, Joshua Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 98% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 99%
Communication 99% 100% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 97%
Admin Performance 99% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Rueter, Jeffrey Meets JPR Standards 26 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 97% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 96%
Communication 94% n/a 97%
Temperament 90% n/a 95%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 97%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Ryan-Touhill, Jennifer Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 93% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 85%
Communication 95% n/a 83%
Temperament 91% n/a 83%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 83%
Settlement Activities 88% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Sinclair, Joan M. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 93% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% 100% 100%
Communication 97% 100% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 98% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Smith, James Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 95% n/a 88%
Communication 92% n/a 92%
Temperament 87% n/a 90%
Admin Performance 97% n/a 93%
Settlement Activities 96% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Staring, Christopher P. Meets JPR Standards 26 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 96% 100%
Integrity 100% 100%
Communication 100% n/a
Temperament n/a n/a
Admin Performance 96% 100%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Steiner, Ronee Korbin Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 97% n/a 95%
Communication 90% n/a 93%
Temperament 90% n/a 85%
Admin Performance 100% n/a 92%
Settlement Activities 85% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Sukenic, Howard Meets JPR Standards 18 1
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 95% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 95%
Communication 87% n/a 93%
Temperament 80% n/a 83%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 94%
Settlement Activities 77% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Svoboda, Pamela Hearn Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 94% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% n/a 94%
Communication 96% n/a 94%
Temperament 97% n/a 93%
Admin Performance 96% n/a 94%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Swann, Peter B. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 91% 93%
Integrity 97% 99%
Communication 97% n/a
Temperament 95% n/a
Admin Performance 100% 97%
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Viola, Danielle J. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 99% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 99% 100%
Communication 99% 97% 100%
Temperament 98% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 99% 99% 100%
Settlement Activities 98% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Warner, Randall H. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 98% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% 100% 100%
Communication 98% 100% 100%
Temperament 98% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 100% 100% 100%
Admin Skills n/a n/a n/a
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Washburn, Daniel Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 93% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% n/a 100%
Communication 92% n/a 100%
Temperament 100% n/a 100%
Admin Performance 98% n/a 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Welty, Joseph C. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 100% n/a 98%
Communication 97% n/a 93%
Temperament 97% n/a 88%
Admin Performance 99% n/a 91%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
White, Kevin D. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 100% n/a n/a
Integrity 96% 100% 93%
Communication 100% 99% 100%
Temperament 99% 100% 95%
Admin Performance 100% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 100% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Whitehead, Roy Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 98% n/a 100%
Communication 91% n/a 96%
Temperament 98% n/a 98%
Admin Performance 90% n/a 97%
Settlement Activities 90% n/a n/a
Judge Commission Vote Meet Votes Does Not Meet Votes
Woods, Catherine M. Meets JPR Standards 27 0
2018 Attorney Surveys Juror Surveys Litigant Witness Surveys
Legal Ability 92% n/a n/a
Integrity 99% 100% 100%
Communication 94% 100% 100%
Temperament 97% 100% 100%
Admin Performance 98% 100% 100%
Settlement Activities 93% n/a n/a

4 Comments on "Election 2018: Know Your Judges"

  1. Thanks for posting this information.

    There was one election where one of
    the Judges failed miserably on this
    JPR.

    I checked the election results, and
    the yes/ no percentages were pretty
    consistent among all the Judges- the
    miserable Judge was retained having
    received only 7% less “yes” votes than
    the crowd.

    The inference is that only about 7% of
    voters bother to check these ratings.
    By the way, the meets vs. doesn’t meet
    [standards] was something like 5 meets
    and 18 doesn’t meet- not even close- for
    the Judge whose name and Court assignment
    escapes me now.

  2. GABRIEL GONZALES | October 20, 2018 at 9:32 pm |

    I THANK YOU GREATLY FOR THIS JPR. IN PAST YEARS, NEVER NEW ANYTHING ABOUT ANY JUDGES I WAS ABOUT TO VOTE FOR, ITS GOOD TO AT LEAST HAVE A RATING. THANK YOU FOR SHINING SOME LIGHT, I KNOW JUDGES ARE TO BE IMPARTIAL, BUT I JUST WISH I KNEW THERE POLITICS, WHETHER THEY LEAN R OR D / RIGHT OR LEFT… YOUR SITE WAS RECOMMENDED BY JAMES T. HARRIS… AGAIN THANK YOU…

  3. William Favor | October 23, 2018 at 2:40 pm |

    you should endeavor to get the political party affiliation of all the judges, even though that doesn’t appear on the ballot.

  4. The Oracle of Tucson | October 24, 2018 at 5:54 am |

    I never vote to retain any judges.
    Based on past problems, Judges should be periodically replaced to help ensure they don’t grow to comfortable.

    The Oracle

Comments are closed.