In a complex case the Arizona Corporation Commission has found that a water company did not discriminates against a property owner.
In a case involving Circle City Water Company (CCWCo) and landowner Mr. Robert Broyles, the Arizona Corporation Commissioners voted 5-0 to order that Circle City provide service to Mr. Broyles.
Broyles filed a complaint against CCWCo, alleging that the company had violated A.R.S. §40-334(A) by requiring him to enter into a Main Extension Agreement (MXA) before extending water service to his property.
However, after thorough examination of testimony and evidence, the Commission determined that CCWCo did not discriminate. The Decision orders CCWCo to extend a service line to Broyles’ Cardozo Dr. property, subject to tariffed fees, deeming it a temporary service that may convert to permanent upon agreement.