Supreme Court hears Gilbert church sign case

On Monday, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys presented oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in the matter of Reed v. Town of Gilbert. The case involves a challenge by Good News Community Church, in Gilbert, Ariz., and Pastor Clyde Reed of the sign codes.

Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel David Cortman said after his oral argument in defense of free speech on Monday, “The Supreme Court should ensure that no government in America is allowed to prefer one form of speech over another. No one’s speech is safe if the government is allowed to pick free-speech winners and losers based on the types of speech government officials prefer. The Supreme Court has a long history of ensuring that the government treats all speech in a content-neutral manner. That’s why we trust the court will not allow the town of Gilbert to continue giving preferential treatment to certain messages while marginalizing others.”

According to ADF, the church rents space in temporary locations for its weekly service. It uses small, temporary signs to invite and direct the community to its services. The Town of Gilbert Sign Code imposes strict limits on the size, location, number, and duration of the church’s signs. It does not impose the same restrictions on political, ideological, and homeowners’ association signs. If the church violates the code, Pastor Reed could be fined and possibly jailed.

Gilbert sign ordinance provisions
Gilbert sign ordinance provisions
About ADI Staff Reporter 15711 Articles
Under the leadership of Editor-in -Chief Huey Freeman, our team of staff reporters bring accurate,timely, and complete news coverage.