Tucson Criminal Defense Attorney, Assistant Arrested For Obstruction

FBI agents arrested Tucson attorney Rafael F. Gallego and his assistant, Ricardo Gallego, for allegedly obstructing justice, tampering with a witness and assisting an offender in avoiding apprehension in a criminal case.

According to the unsealed federal grand jury indictment, the charges against 59-year-old Rafael F. Gallego and 39-year-old Ricardo Gallego, include one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice; one count of conspiracy to commit false statements; one substantive count of obstruction of justice; one count of accessory after the fact; and, one count of conspiracy to tamper with a witness.

The indictment alleges that from January 2017 to October 2017, the defendants conspired to corruptly effect the administration of justice in a criminal matter involving Efrain Corrales-Perez that was pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.


The indictment alleges that the Gallegos provided false information to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents and an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the District of Arizona. The indictment further alleges that the Gallegos, having knowledge of the commission of a drug trafficking offense, provided assistance to Corrales-Perez in order to hinder and prevent the his apprehension, trial and punishment.

The indictment also alleges that Gallegos conspired to corruptly persuade an individual to provide false information to law enforcement investigators.

Upon conviction, the Gallegos face up to 20 years in federal prison for witness tampering; up to ten years in federal prison for obstruction of justice; and, up to five years in federal prison for the remaining conspiracy charges.


  1. Ah, yes, one more Mexican gaming the system and lying to protecte his ass and his worthless POS druggie client. Should find him guilty and ship his ass to prison in Mexico. Would serve both father and son to see what kind of society they are protecting south of the border.

  2. My guess this is government overreach and an attempt to intimidate the criminal defense community. One wonders if there was a wire tap in this case and how the evidence to support the indictment was obtained without a violation of the attorney/client privilege? This trend of charging individuals with providing “false information,” is quite disturbing given the fact that law enforcement, quite literally, can lie in the performance of law enfocement duties. It is inconsonant.

Comments are closed.