Arizona Lawmakers Join Critics Of Trump’s Syria Troop Withdrawal

President Donald Trump announced Sunday that he was withdrawing U.S. troops from northern Syria because the fight against the ISIS caliphate had been won. But critics fear the move will leave Kurds there, U.S. allies, vulnerable and revive ISIS. (Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian/White House)

By Harrison Mantas

WASHINGTON – Arizona lawmakers joined a growing bipartisan chorus critical of President Donald Trump’s decision to pull American troops from Northern Syria, even as Trump continued to defend the plan Thursday.

Sen. Martha McSally is one of several Republicans – including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell – who this week called the move short-sighted, saying it will allow a return of the Islamic State that could threaten the U.S.

They also said the move leaves a key U.S. ally, the Kurds, vulnerable to attacks from Turkish forces – attacks the Turks launched Wednesday.

Of the other Arizona lawmakers who have weighed in, the reaction is more predictably partisan, with Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and three House Democrats opposing, while two House Republicans backed the withdrawal.

Trump’s sudden decision Sunday to pull U.S. troops followed a phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who said Turkey would “soon be moving forward with its long-planned operation into Northern Syria,” according to the White House. Erdoğan has called the Kurds, an ethnic minority in the region, “terrorists.”

Trump said U.S. troops had helped defeat the Islamic State group and that they would “no longer be in the immediate area.” By Tuesday, the Pentagon was saying that U.S. troops had been moved “out of the path of potential Turkish incursion to ensure their safety.”

But lawmakers were already pushing back by Monday.

“Abandoning our partners in the war on the Islamic State will only jeopardize America’s security, strengthen Iran and Russia, and put our allies at greater risk,” Sinema said in a statement Monday.

On Tuesday, McSally said in an interview on Fox News that “Turkey needs to be deterred” and the U.S. needs to “stand with the Kurds.”

“I support the president?s objective,” McSally said, before adding “we cannot tolerate a NATO ally now coming in and mowing them (Kurdish forces) down. That is just not the right message, and it’s not good for the safety of America.”

Trump pushed back on Twitter, where he said he was “trying to end the ENDLESS WARS,” and where he laid out three options for dealing with Turkey.

“Send in thousands of troops and win militarily, hit Turkey very hard financially and with sanctions, or mediate a deal between Turkey and the Kurds,” Trump tweeted.

In remarks to reporters Thursday, Trump said his preference would be the third option.

“I hope we can mediate,” Trump said. “Turkey knows where I stand … we won.”

But the Senate is already eyeing sanctions against Turkey and Turkish officials, including Erdogan. A proposal drafted by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, D-S.C., would also impose restrictions on military and energy supplies to Turkey, among other measures.

Graham, normally a steadfast support of the president, called the troop withdrawal a “disaster in the making.”

Besides McSally and Sinema, five of Arizona’s nine House members have commented on the troop withdrawal.

Republican Reps. Andy Biggs of Gilbert and Paul Gosar of Prescott support the withdrawal.

Speaking Tuesday on the Chad Benson Show, Biggs said the Syrian Kurds are “effectively paid mercenaries,” and argued the withdrawal should be part of a larger debate over Congress’ power to declare war.”

“Explain to me what we’re doing there if we don’t have the congressional authority to be there,” Biggs said. “As long as we’re not going to have congressional authority to be there … then what is the point of our U.S. Constitution when it comes to foreign affairs like this?”

But Democratic Reps. Raul Grijalva of Tucson and Greg Stanton and Ruben Gallego, both of Phoenix, came out against the president, with Gallego using his personal Twitter account to say it was Trump’s “incompetence and sheer dumbness” that endangered the Kurds.

On his congressional Twitter account Thursday, Gallego took a less-strident tone.

“@RepJasonCrow and I served. We know how dangerous it is for Trump to abandon our allies,” said Gallego, a Marine veteran of Iraq. “We’re asking him now – what’s your plan?”

McSally said she hopes some solution can be reached, but not at the expense of the Kurds – and, ultimately, the U.S.

“They’re the ones that defeated the (Islamic) caliphate,” she said Tuesday. “If we turn a blind eye, they will just come back and attack America.”


-Cronkite News video by Heather Cumberledge

5 Comments

  1. So we send 3000 troops to Saudi Arabia — home of the 9/11 killers — while our friends the Turks bomb Americans in Syria. WTF?

  2. why is MERICA worlds cop??
    who said WE HAVE RIGHT TO DO THIS(ie interfere in SOVEREIGN COUNTRY AFFAIRS)
    and WHEN OUR PRESIDENT uses ECONOMIC threats(like virtually all other presidents before)
    it is IMPEACHABLE??? really
    sounds like double-talk and hypocritical thinking(sarcasm)
    middle east costs in past 20 years – over $1,000,000,000,000 and THOUSANDS OF U.S. SERVICEMEN AND WOMAN’S DEATHS and countless PERMANENT INJURIES to their bodies

    time to BRING HOME OUR SOLDIERS and ONLY NEOCONS will disagree
    $$$ BETTER SPENT ON PROBLEMS WITHIN OUR OWN COUNTRY

  3. Turkey betrayed us at the last moment in the invasion of Iraq, by refusing to let US troops invade northern Iraq from Turkish territory. The Kurds stepped up and became our northern army, and it was their blood spilled to hand us half of Iraq. Then along comes ISIS and again it was the Kurds blood spilled to clear them from Iraq and Syria. Now, Trump takes credit for the Kurds defeat of ISIS and betrays them in favor of newly Islamist Turkey that wants to inflict genocide against every Kurd man, woman and child? Oh, well done! No nation or group will ally themselves with the US ever again.

  4. Yep, the military lobbying groups are alive and doing well. None of the mouths(critics) have to explain to the parents of the dead why their kid died and none of the mouths(critics) have to sign the letters notifying the parents of the dead so I’d say to the critics…..Get a back bone and stand up to the lobbying groups and say enough. I’m sure you can get more campaign money from other groups.

  5. Whatever happened to : “Give Peace A Chance”? Heck, if it doesn’t work then bomb the hell out of ISIS, hunt them down and kill them all.

Comments are closed.