DOJ Prepared to Defend Lake’s Removal of Former VOA Director

Lake
Kari Lake speaking with attendees at the 2021 Southwest Regional Conference in Phoenix, Arizona. [Photo courtesy Gage Skidmore]

A letter dated July 28, from U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer to House Speaker Mike Johnson reveals that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is prepared to defend the removal of former Voice of America (VOA) Director Michael Abramowitz. The removal was ordered by Acting Chief Executive Officer Kari Lake of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

Solicitor General Sauer explained the restriction against Abramowitz’s termination in a letter, obtained by The Arizona Daily Independent, writing, “The head of Voice of America, an inferior executive officer, is appointed by the Chief Executive Officer of the United States Agency for Global Media. See 22 U.S.C. 6205(e)(l). A federal statute provides that the Chief Executive Officer may remove the head of Voice of America only with the approval of the Independent Broadcasting Advisory Board.”

The Solicitor General then laid out the administration’s legal position that the DOJ “will file in defense of the removal of Michael Abramowitz from that office.”

He wrote, “ Under Article II, inferior executive officers must be removable at will by the President or by a department head acting on the President’s behalf. See Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 591 U.S. 197, 215 (2020). The Supreme Court has recognized only one narrow exception to that ‘general rule.’ Ibid. That exception extends, at most, to certain domestic inferior officers ‘with limited duties and no policymaking or administrative authority.’ Id at 218. The head of Voice of America falls outside that exception. Among other things, he exercises significant policymaking or administrative authority in supervising Voice of America, and Voice of America’s activities implicate the President’s authority to manage foreign affairs.” Sauer concluded that the legal opinion is supported by precedent set in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled: “In our constitutional system, the executive power belongs to the President, and that power generally includes the ability to supervise and remove the agents who wield executive power in his stead. While we have previously upheld limits on the President’s removal authority in certain contexts, we decline to do so when it comes to principal officers who, acting alone, wield significant executive power. The Constitution requires that such officials remain dependent on the President, who in turn is accountable to the people.” As reported by AZ Free News, Abramowitz’s termination was decided after he declined reassignment to the agency’s Edward R. Murrow Transmitting Station of the International Broadcasting Bureau in Greenville, NC and that the USAGM maintains “the Chief Executive

Officer, acting on the President’s behalf, may lawfully remove the Voice of America Director, an inferior officer.”

In the Solicitor General’s legal opinion, Acting Chief Executive Officer of USAGM Kari Lake, must necessarily have the power to appoint and remove personnel from the agency at will to satisfy the President’s duties under the Constitution as vested by Congress: “the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”

About ADI Staff Reporter 13761 Articles
Under the leadership of Editor-in -Chief Huey Freeman, our team of staff reporters bring accurate,timely, and complete news coverage.

2 Comments

  1. Article I (of the federal constitution): Establishes the Legislative Branch, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
    Article II: Establishes the Executive Branch, headed by the President.
    Article III: Establishes the Judicial Branch, primarily the Supreme Court, and defines its powers.
    Article IV: Addresses the relationship between the states and the federal government, including provisions for state citizenship, the admission of new states, and the protection of states.
    Article V: Outlines the process for amending the Constitution.
    Article VI: Declares the Constitution as the supreme law of the land and addresses the issue of debts and oaths of office.
    Article VII: Details the process for the ratification of the Constitution.

    I don’t see a dog-gone thing in there about establishing a Bureaucratic Branch headed by anyone, let alone the judiciary. Anyone who falls under the Executive logically serves at the pleasure of the President, period, full stop. Anything else is inventing powers out of whole cloth.

  2. Obama came in and fired all the conservative Generals in the military. We dealt with it. Lake fires some nobody at VOA and the left swamp lawyers throw a fit.

Comments are closed.