Document Outlines Criteria For Rumored TUSD “Black List”

For years Tucson Unified School District employees had talked about a mysterious “black list” that the District’s administration had created in order to block “enemies” from future employment. The list was rumored to be the source of some employees’ inability to be hired by other districts as well.

The foundation for the list has been discovered. The Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) Hiring or Not Rehiring Guidelines was given to Board members last week at their request by interim Superintendent Dr. Gabriel Trujillo. Unlike his predecessors, Dr. Trujillo has been transparent in his dealings and responsive to Board members’ requests for information.

A review of the documents shows that it was first developed on August 16, 2012 during former Superintendent John Pedicone’s tenure. It was revised during the H.T. Sanchez administration, and according to multiple sources was used to punish employees, who dared to challenge the administration.  [View “TUSD NR Guidelines” here]

Purpose: These guidelines will be used by TUSD HR team members to assist in providing consistency when processing hiring and non rehiring personnel actions.

Tucson Unified School District is committed to a policy of nondiscrimination based on disability, race, color, religion/religious beliefs, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, or national origin. This policy will prevail in all matters concerning Governing Board, District employees, students, the public, educational programs and services, and individuals with whom the Board does business.

The District may consider former employees for reemployment for individuals that separated from TUSD in good standing. All applicants for employment to include former employees are subject to TUSD’s hiring and selection policies and procedures, including reference and background checks.

TUSD reserves the right to hire the best qualified applicants to ensure they provide excellent education to support our STUDENTS throughout the District.

1) Who’s eligible for hire or rehire to TUSD

a) New applicants, who meet all the minimum qualifications for the position they are applying for, and pass the required security clearance and reference requirements, could be considered for employment with the District.

b) Former employees who resigned in good standing could be consider for reemployment providing they clear all the required clearances and reference checks, and possess the minimum qualifications for the posted position.

2) Who’s not eligible for hire or rehire with TUSD

a) Former employees who violated District policies and were terminated or resigned in lieu of termination.

b) Former employees placed in the Non-Referred list (AKA 500) files are not eligible for rehire.

c) Applicants who receive poor references may not be eligible for hire.

d) Applicants who cannot clear background checks or obtain a valid IVP Fingerprint Clearance Card are not eligible for hire.

e) Substitutes who have been terminated by the district for performance or conduct related issues could be placed in the non-referred list.

3) HR processing of Separation Agreements or other non-referred actions

a) Separation Agreements are provided to Human Resources by the Legal Department.

b) Administrators must initiate the Personnel Action Form (PAF) supporting the Separation Agreement. If the PAF is not received, HR will notify the respective Assistanct Superintendent and request the PAF be completed that day. The PAF and the Separation Agreement should to be kept together through the personnel action process to support PeopleSoft and AppliTrack coding.

c) HR will provide copies of such PAF’s to PC, Labor Relations, HR Records and Payroll, for their pending files and actions.

d) Separation Agreements that directly state the individual is not eligible for rehire will be placed in the non-referred (AKA 500) files. In addition, a remark will be noted in AppliTrack indicating that the applicant is not eligible for rehire.

e) If a Separation Agreement does not specify the rehire status, AppliTrack will be marked as “pending rehire clarification” from the respective Secondary or Elementary – K-8 Assistant Superintendents. Once clarification is received, AppliTrack will be noted accordingly.

i) If a former employee signed a separation agreement in lieu of disciplinary action(s) for misconduct, the applicant is not eligible for rehire.

ii) If a former employee signed a separation agreement due to performance issues and/or to avoid a Plan of Improvement, the applicant might be able to return to the District after a period of two (2) year from the date of separation. After the two years, the applicant can appeal the non-rehire status. The applicant must meet the minimum qualifications for the position applied for, and pass all required reference and security checks. Providing everything clears, the applicant could then be considered for employment.

iii) Former employees who were terminated due to misconduct will not be considered for substitute positions.

iv) If terminated for reasons other than misconduct, the applicants could be considered for substitute positions, on a case by case basis.

4) Maintaining the Non-Rehire files

a) The Non-Referred (AKA 500) file can include; but is not limited to the following documents:

i) Separation Agreement

ii) Statement of charges

iii) Resignations in lieu of terminations

b) Any other supporting documentation used in determining the employee’s or applicant’s non-hire or rehire status will be maintained in the 500 file.

5) Right to Appeal Non-Rehire Status

a) Any individual who is on the do not hire file/list has the right to appeal this status. This should be requested no later than 5 years from the termination date. Other appeals however, could be considered, if extenuating circumstance precluded the 5 year deadline.

b) A letter must be submitted to the CHRO requesting reconsideration of employment with the District. The letter must articulate the reason(s) for the appeal.

i) The CHRO or designated representative can deny the request for employment or reemployment with the District.

ii) The CHRO can modify in part or in whole; the hire or non-rehire status, if supporting evidence and research proves and/or warrants such actions.
6) The information contacts are:

Wayne Chin-Duncan, Sr. HR Program Coordinator
Wayne.ChinDuncan@tusd1.org
520-225-6450
Or
Janet Rico Uhrig, Director of Talent Acquisition Recruiting and Retention
Janet.ricouhrig@tusd1.org
225-6035

9 Comments on "Document Outlines Criteria For Rumored TUSD “Black List”"

  1. Luke Abrams | May 8, 2017 at 11:41 am |

    On the Radio program Wake Up Tucson this morning, TUSD Board member Dr Stegeman noted that some on the “do not rehire black list” were not aware they were on the list, even though the written policy states they had a right to appeal “a do not rehire” designation. This right to appeal is meaningless if the person is not notified of being put on the “do not hire black list.” To remedy this “star chamber” aspect of this “black list,” it would appear to be incumbent on the TUSD Board to notify, in writing, everyone listed as a “do not re-hire” past employee so they are aware of this highly suspect designation and may thus exercise their right to appeal or take other appropriate actions.

  2. YO! (me) | May 8, 2017 at 9:18 pm |

    How about hiring Teachers not minimum qualified (2 year degree in ?????). 83 year old retiree?

    • David Thompson | May 9, 2017 at 6:55 am |

      AMEN YO!(me), it is verging on criminal what they are putting in front of the community’s children while lining the Administrators pockets. the TUSD board needs to clean that place out.

  3. Richard Hernandez | May 9, 2017 at 9:01 am |

    Certainly there will be more of this type of behavior that i trust adi to expose.

    The uglyness of power and greed. Jaja sound like I have said again and again, in Pima County there is a contagious disease greed & power.

  4. Brian Sauber | May 9, 2017 at 12:56 pm |

    I know this blacklist , or do not hire list is real because I have been a victim of it . Not only have I not been able to be rehired by TUSD, but they have made sure that I will not be hired by anyone. My termination wrongful, and used to cover up a scandel that had happened in TUSD. It was my inquiries that got Dr. Stegeman to investigate this. I have since found out that TUSDs former Employee Relations Director was a fraud, using the title pH.D when he didn’t even have a BA. This man is responsible for putting people on this list and nothing has been done about it. I have sent the evidence of this to the ADI and I hope they do a story soon , to expose these criminal acts.

  5. The sad part is that lives of good, highly trained, educators are ruined financially because someone has a mad on against you for no other reason that they can and enjoy doing it secretly. What cowards! Meanwhile, nepotism runs rampant in some departments and the relatives or friends are not qualified to do the job. I wonder if a class action lawsuit is viable?

    • Brian Sauber | May 10, 2017 at 5:25 pm |

      Class action not only on this but the Shannon Roberts Employee Relations issue. he not only defrauded every employee but every taxpayer in TUSD.

Comments are closed.