Lack Of Resources Leads To ‘Grim Statistics’ In Native American Schools

Then-Interior Secretary Sally Jewell in 2016 visits Cove Day School in Red Rock, one of two Navajo schools that had been waiting 12 years for previously approved federal repair funds. Experts say scarce resources is one reason behind tribal education problems. (Photo by Tami A. Heilemann/Interior Department)

By Kyley Schultz

WASHINGTON – When President Lyndon Johnson laid out a set of sweeping plans for Native American education 50 years ago, from preschool to college, one of the most immediate goals was enrolling 10,000 tribal youth in Head Start programs.

That goal was soon met, but little else envisioned by Johnson has progressed as successfully.

Fifty years after Johnson’s “Special Message to the Congress on the Problems of the American Indian: ‘The Forgotten American,’” there has been progress in the education of tribal youth. But Native Americans still lagbehind the rest of the country on test scores, graduation rates and school resources.

Regina Bitsoi, a tribal education specialist in New Mexico, can tick off the “grim statistics” of education for American Indian students who have seen little progress in standardized testing scores, high school graduation rates and expulsion rates. The results are not surprising given the lack of resources for tribal schools, she said.

“An alien in his own land”

What’s happened in the 50 years since President Lyndon Johnson called on Congress to enact sweeping programs to help Native Americans, people he called “the Forgotten American.”

“You are seeing a population that has been tremendously stunted in growth due to lack of resources and quite honestly, a lack of care,” Bitsoi said. “Many of these schools are in terrible conditions and have little to no supplies, making learning even more difficult.”

A case in point is Havasupai Elementary School, which was ranked the lowest-performing school in the Bureau of Indian Education system in a 2014-2015 bureau report. Nine students from the school have sued the bureau for “knowingly failing to provide basic general education.”

Rep. Tom O’Halleran, D-Sedona, whose district includes the Havasupai reservation, said he has “grave concerns” about the school’s “abysmal” performance. In an April letter to BIE Director Tony Dearman, O’Halleran said he was told there was only one permanent teacher and one special education teacher for all nine grades in the school.

“The lack of attention to Havasupai Elementary and the resulting poor educational outcomes and safety concerns are completely unacceptable,” O’Halleran wrote. “From a mishandled sexual assault case to abysmal educational outcomes, the Bureau of Indian Education has repeatedly failed the Havasupai Tribe, and we ought to be ashamed.”

The 2014-15 BIE report listed students at the school as “0 percent proficient” in both English and math sections, a number mirrored in Native American National Assessment of Education Progress scores. American Indian/Alaskan Native students are the only subgroup that has not shown steady improvements in proficiency in both reading and math.

When Johnson spoke in 1968, he said the average American Indian adult had an eighth-grade education, that 10 percent of Indian children over age 14 had no schooling at all and that “roughly half” of Indian children did not finish high school.

The high school graduation rate for Native Americans had risen to 67 percent by 2014, according to the Native Youth Report for that year. It was 72 percent by 2015-2016, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, but that still trailed far behind the national average of 84 percent that school year, and graduation rates at BIE schools trailed farther still.

“The American Indian/Alaska Native high school graduation rate is 67 percent, the lowest of any racial/ethnic demographic group across all schools,” the Native Youth Report said in 2014. “The most recent Department of Education data indicate that the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools fare even worse, with a graduation rate of 53 percent, compared to a national average of 80 percent.”

Related stories:
• After decades, tribal courts, police slowly regaining lost authority
• Despite gains, Native American employment still lags behind nation
• Native Americans close the gap – almost – on U.S. life expectancy

There are currently 183 BIE schools, 54 of which are in Arizona, more than any other state, according to a bureau directory. Bureau officials did not return calls seeking comment for this story.

But the national average for Native American students does not reflect the situation everywhere in Indian Country, said Ahniwake Rose, executive director of the National Indian Education Association. She said the numbers will fluctuate by state, and that there are “definitely areas that are doing and seeing better than others.”

“Even if we are able to find out how our students are performing as a general population, there is a really big difference in American Indian/Alaska Natives,” Rose said. “How kids are doing in Alaska, which is much different than how kids are performing in White Mountain Apache, so it’s not a cohesive picture.”

Rose said one reason for that is the lack of data on tribal education.

But she said there have been gains, none more impressive than the Head Start surge Johnson envisioned.

Rose said the program has seen “great success,” with 24,700 tribal children currently enrolled in Head Start. She calls the program “absolutely vital” to the academic success of tribal youth.

“The LBJ stat about 10,000 children hoping to be in this program, we were absolutely able to do that,” Rose said. “Tribes are able to create culturally appropriate language programs and curriculum that are engaging for tribal students, which is vital to their success.”

Given the faltering gains of the past 50 years, Rose said the need for tribal education reform is “desperately needed,” now more than ever.

“Indian students are the only students that America has a constitutional requirement to educate,” she said. “We really need to pay attention to what is happening with them now and not leave them behind while others climb so far ahead.”


  1. “Rose said one reason for that is the lack of data on tribal education.”
    Just like there is a lack of data on the Tribal Resources coming from the Casinos they operate. If you broke that wide open, you would find that most of the Profits are going to the Elders and their families.

    • Then you would be wrong. First only a Tribe that has federal recognition can have anything that generates funds for the Tribe, and less than half of all the Tribes in this Country have that. Then the State has to approve it for a percentage of the profits such as AZ does. Then both Houses of Congress, the BLM and BIA has to approve it. Then you get an agreement for building and running it for a larger percent of the profits to pay the costs back. Then the IRS requires complete records of everything spent, and paid out from it as does the BIA which also sends it to both Houses of Congress. Then a small percentage goes into a fund to help other Tribes that doesn’t have federal recog.. While some Tribes do give payments from them to Tribal members many more don’t. They invest funds for healthcare, elder/child care, schools, jobs on the reservation, housing and so on.

  2. Haven`t studies shown conclusively that the educational benefits of Head Start is close to zero over even the intermediate term? So, why is the National Indian Education Association so proud of a large enrollment in Head Start rather than using the money to fund K-12? There is no real analysis of what the funding levels of tribal schools is in the article, it focuses almost exclusively on lack of performance. In 1975 Congress passed The Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act which allows (and encouraged) tribal governments to operate their own schools so at least some part of the general failings in educating American Indian youth today has to be ascribed to tribal leaders who contract to run their own schools. Unfortunately tribal schools are not immune from the mismanagement we see at TUSD and other school districts today, however, tribal schools do not have the past experience of doing better at educating students that TUSD and the others can look to.

    • Remember Tribal schools not only come under the State school system they are required to have the same curriculum as the State. It comes under the State Tribal education compact, but the grants come under the BIA. The Tribal Education Department or TED. The schools are full of volunteers to include staff and teachers so most of the funds go to the students education. Not all Tribes have schools, and there are still 12 Federal forced schools still in operation today.

  3. Read the last paragraph in the article: The pheds at work. Get ’em outta education.

  4. if the guys who did this graph are the educators… its no wonder – what a lousy graphic..

Comments are closed.