AG Sues Arizona Regents For Unconstitutional Tuition Hikes

The Arizona Attorney General’s Office filed a lawsuit against the Arizona Board of Regents for dramatically and unconstitutionally increasing the price of base tuition and mandatory fees at Arizona’s public universities by more than 300 percent since 2003. The Arizona Constitution requires that “the university and all other state educational institutions shall be open to students of both sexes, and the instruction furnished shall be as nearly free as possible.”

“Every Arizonan dreams of being able to send their kids to college,” said Attorney General Mark Brnovich. “Within the last 15 years, Arizona went from having some of the most affordable public universities to having some of the most expensive. We believe the Board of Regents needs to be held accountable and answer tough questions for Arizona’s skyrocketing tuition rates.”

The State alleges that ABOR has adopted unconstitutional tuition-setting policies, has abandoned its duty to serve as a check on the university presidents, and has ceased deriving tuition rates from the actual cost of instruction. According to the lawsuit, ABOR has misinterpreted its “nearly free” mandate to mean whatever the market rate is for peer institutions and made itself as the arbiter of “affordability” for Arizona’s students and families.

At the same time, the universities have decreased the quality of the courses offered. Students are encouraged to obtain degrees in study areas that offer few employment opportunities. According to one University of Arizona professor, who serves on the General Education Committee, that reviews proposed classes, staff has been encouraged to approve low rigor courses that have “sex appeal.” The professor, who asked not be identified, said that their “more serious colleagues” will not be able to protect STEM courses if they do not approve money generating grievance studies-based course titles.

The Arizona Attorney General’s Office noted that “intertwined with these price hikes, ABOR has also refused to comply with Arizona law prohibiting state subsidies for students “without lawful immigration status.” The AG argues that ABOR is causing the illegal expenditure of public monies and the failure to collect tuition in direct contravention of clear and established Arizona law.

Related articles:

Why Are Arizona’s Universities Hiking Tuition?

Arizona University Leaders Call New Budget “Devastating”

Regents Reject End Of DACA In-State Tuition Until Court Rules

ASU To Award $1,000 To Top Climate Fiction Short Story

ASU Foundation Tax Filings Reveal Little On Personal Ties, Lobbying Expenses

Lawsuit highlights:

The Arizona Constitution requires that “[t]he university and all other state educational institutions shall be open to students of both sexes, and the instruction furnished shall be as nearly free as possible.” Ariz. Const. art XI, § 6 (emphasis added).

Arizona law provides that ABOR shall “[f]ix tuitions and fees to be charged and differentiate the tuitions and fees between institutions and between residents, nonresidents, undergraduate students, graduate students, students from foreign countries and students who have earned credit hours in excess of the credit hour threshold.” A.R.S. § 15-1626(A)(5).

Fifteen years ago (the 2002-2003 academic year), the base tuition and mandatory fees for in-state students starting as undergraduates at the three Universities was approximately $2,600 per year.

For the 2017-2018 academic year, base tuition and fees for in-state students starting as undergraduates is as follows:

Name of InstitutionResident Tuition and Mandatory Fees for 2017-18Increase Since 2002-03
University of Arizona – Main Campus$12,228370%
Northern Arizona University – Flagstaff Campus$11,059325%
Arizona State University – All Campuses$10,792315%

In contrast to the increases in tuition, the consumer price index has increased only 36% over the same approximate period. Bureau of Labor Statistics data for change between July 2002 and July 2017, available at, accessed Sep. 6, 2017.

All public universities, with the inflationary pressures of broad student loan expansion, did mildly outpace the consumer price index over the same period of time. The national average tuition for public 4-year institutions climbed slightly over 100% as opposed to Arizona’s wild increases of more than 300%. In 2002, when the constitutional mandate still mattered to ABOR, Arizona tuition hovered around the 25th percentile nationally. After a mere 15 years of ignoring the constitutional madate, Arizona’s public university tuition exceeds the 75th percentile nationally.

Similarly, median family income in Arizona increased only 27% over a comparable period (from $46,723 in 2000 to $59,480 in 2015). Census Bureau data, available at, accessed Sep. 6, 2017.

This means that ABOR has raised the base tuition and fees for in-state students starting as undergraduates at approximately nine to ten times the rate of inflation and approximately twelve to thirteen times the rate of increase of median family income over the period covering the last fifteen years. Below is a chart that on information and belief shows ASU tuition and fees from 1987 to 2011.


  1. Glad they are looking into and suing. Now If they would only Look into some of the shenanigans going on in Pima county. Really really wish they would do that.

  2. In order to give to one person, the government must first take from some other person. Mike is correct when he says half the students pay nothing. Half of the remaining students pay less then what the “normal” tuition is. And to “JT”, you fail to mention that the “cuts in the state’s financial contributions” and monies taken from taxpayers.

  3. The inflation is there because half of ASU students pay no tuition themselves. Yes, google it. Half of the students are getting a free ride from (mostly) government grants.

  4. Arizona’s constitution provides a state funding source, but try telling the ‘environmentalists’ that. They would rather that our children have poor education than actually using that source of funds.

    “Article 11 Section 8 – Permanent state school fund; source; apportionment of state funds

    8. Permanent state school fund; source; apportionment of state funds

    Section 8. A. A permanent state school fund for the use of the common schools shall be derived from the sale of public school lands or other public lands specified in the enabling act approved June 20, 1910; from all estates or distributive shares of estates that may escheat to the state; from all unclaimed shares and dividends of any corporation incorporated under the laws of Arizona; and from all gifts, devises, or bequests made to the state for general educational purposes.

    B. The rental derived from school lands, with such other funds as may be provided by law shall be apportioned only for common and high school education in Arizona, and in such manner as may be prescribed by law.”

    Ok liberals – now you can let your heads explode.

  5. Seems the article did not cover the significant decrease in the State’s financial contribution to the universities and how that has affected tuition levels. I get it, the universities made a political move by not rejecting in state tuition to DACA kids but let’s get a true analysis of both sides here and inform the public instead of manipulating it.

    • Just where do you think “the State’s financial contribution” comes from? Just more of “other people’s money”?

      Nothing more than taking out of one pocket and putting in another.

  6. AG Brnovich is to be highly commended for holding the regents accountable. Corruption in academic administration in this state has been beyond criminal for decades.

  7. As much as I love College Sports it’s sad that the highest paid state employee is not the Governor but the head coaches of the football and basketball teams. It’s no wonder that college tuitions are so high when you have employees who earn $2 and $3M per contract and are continually getting million dollar bonuses as well as other incentives. Someone has to pay for all that and it’s the students and partents of students paying for it.

  8. Sadly, college and university educations have become a scam mainly due to the their cost and lack of marketability of their degrees in many fields unless the graduate takes a useless government job. Not too many real jobs for social justice warrior snowflake studies.

  9. I want to thank the Attorney General for addressing this issue. I work at one of the universities and can assure you the spending is way out of control. The graph in this article says it all.

Comments are closed.