Four aid workers found guilty for leaving water, food in wilderness

Volunteers Geena Jackson and Justine Orlovsky-Schnitzler carry empty water jugs from a supply drop site. The jugs, which were dropped at the site two weeks earlier, appear to be slashed open and emptied. (Photo by Nicole Ludden/Cronkite News)

By Nicole Ludden

Updated Saturday, Jan. 19 at 4:30 p.m.

TUCSON – Four humanitarian aid workers were found guilty Friday on misdemeanor charges involving leaving aid in a restricted area of Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge after a three-day trial.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernardo Velasco found No More Deaths volunteer Natalie Hoffman guilty of all three charges brought against her, while Oona Holcomb, Madeline Huse and Zaachila Orozco-McCormick were found guilty of the two charges brought against them.

Hoffman was convicted of driving in a wilderness area on Aug. 13, 2017.  Hoffman, Oona Holcomb, Madeline Huse and Zaachila Orozco-McCormick were each convicted of entering a wildlife refuge without a permit and abandonment of property.

As the defendants await sentencing, they each face a maximum penalty of six months in prison and a $250 fine each.

The four defendants were convicted as the result of an incident which occurred Aug. 13, 2017, in which they entered Cabeza Prieta without permits.

They were charged with entering the refuge without a permit and abandonment of property, for leaving gallons of water and pallets of beans  in the refuge.

No More Deaths has been leaving aid for illegal border crossers north of  the U.S.-Mexico border for more than a decade. The group leaves the supplies in Cabeza Prieta, which shares 56 miles of the border with Mexico.

In his verdict, Judge Velasco chastised No More Deaths for not properly warning the defendants of the legal repercussions they could face upon entering the refuge.

“No one in charge of No More Deaths ever informed them that their conduct could be prosecuted as a criminal offense nor did any of the Defendants make any independent inquiry into the legality or consequences of their activities,” Velasco wrote in his ruling.

In a press release Friday, No More Deaths stressed the significance of the verdict.

“This verdict challenges not only No More Deaths volunteers, but people of conscience throughout the country,” No More Deaths volunteer Catherine Gaffney said. “If giving water to someone dying of thirst is illegal, what humanity is left in the law of this country?”

Tensions with legal authorities are nothing new for the group, but the last time a humanitarian aid volunteer along the border was found guilty was a decade ago.

Dan Millis was charged with littering for leaving gallons of water at the Buenos Aires National Wildlife refuge in 2008, which was overturned by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2010.

Four more No More Deaths volunteers are scheduled to begin their trials on February 26.

Caitlin Deighan is charged with driving in a wilderness area. Deighan, Zoe Anderson, Logan Hollarsmith and Rebecca Grossman-Richeimer face charges of entering a national wildlife refuge without a permit.

Scott Warren, another volunteer with No More Deaths, is awaiting trial for charges involving harboring undocumented immigrants, which is considered a felony.

During events held in support of the four volunteers’ legal defense last week, No More Deaths volunteer Justine Orlovsky-Schnitzler spoke to the possibility of being found guilty.

“It’s not over until it’s gone all the way up, you can continue to appeal, and people are certainly prepared for that,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said.

‘Humanitarian aid is never a crime’

Just a few days before the verdicts, amid a vibrant display of freshly painted signs across the street from the courthouse, Millis held a tattered plastic sign that read in bold letters, “Humanitarian aid is never a crime.”

When Millis was convicted in 2008, the same slogan was used to support his legal defense. That conviction later was overturned.

On Tuesday, he stood in support of four other volunteers facing charges for their own humanitarian work.

“I feel like it’s the same experience that I lived where you’re going about your business, trying to help people as a good Samaritan, yet suddenly the government, out of nowhere, decides to prosecute you,” Millis said.

Millis spoke with reporters outside the Deconcini Federal Court Building in Tucson, supporting four humanitarian aid workers whose trials began this week on misdemeanor charges brought against No More Deaths members in January 2018.

Another volunteer, Scott Warren, is on trial for harboring undocumented immigrants, which is a felony. His trial is ongoing.

Volunteers claim they’ve encountered significant pushback from officials in the Sonoran Desert area, most recently in the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge.

The potential outcome of these trials could have a serious impact on how humanitarian aid groups operate in Arizona’s desert, leaving the decision in the hands of U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernardo Velasco.

Legal issues involving this case include the defense’s claim that constitutional religious liberties protect No More Deaths volunteers’ right to leave aid for those in need. The prosecution, however, asserts the defendants were knowingly in restricted land and broke federal law by entering it without proper permits.

The prosecution’s first witness, U.S. Fish and Wildlife officer Michael West, testified that he responded to the area where the four volunteers were located in August 2017 and found gallons of water and pallets of beans near Charlie Bell Well, a restricted part of the wildlife range.

West claimed none of the volunteers had permits to enter to land, but the defense asserts this is because of a purposeful policy change rooted in animosity toward No More Death volunteers that has increased since President Donald Trump took office.

“Trump was elected in January, and four months later, we went in to get permits.” No More Deaths volunteer Geena Jackson said. “They had added a new clause saying that by initialing here you are agreeing to not put food, water, blankets, socks, medical care out on the refuge.”

Volunteers write messages of support on water jugs they leave behind in the desert. “It’s a difficult journey and we want them to know we are friendly,” volunteer Justine Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. (Photo by Mia Armstrong/Cronkite News)

The defense has asserted that a desperate need for humanitarian aid along the border justifies the defendants’ actions.

The prosecution has declined to comment on the case, citing the need to avoid prejudicing the triers of fact  in the case.

They defense cited a map put together by Humane Borders, another humanitarian aid group that operates near the border, and with the Pima County Medical Examiner’s Office.

According to the map, the remains of 2,816 undocumented border-crossers have been discovered from 2000-17. Of these, 137 have been found in the rugged, unforgiving Cabeza Prieta refuge.

The defense says the humanitarian group is a faith-based organization and, therefore, each volunteer was acting on a religious mandate to help others.

John Fife, a retired pastor from Southside Presbyterian Church in Tucson, testified that he formed No More Deaths as a faith-based, humanitarian aid organization to provide water and medical care to those in need.

“We are all commanded to love with no exceptions,” Fife said.

Judge Velasco asked Fife, “Does this faith exercise the right of martyrs?” Fife asserted that “One must make appropriate sacrifices to serve.”

As No More Deaths faces legal opposition, their efforts to provide aid in the borderlands have increased.

In light of the four defendants facing trial this week, the group organized canvassing and supply drop events on Saturday to raise awareness of the legal charges brought against them.

“Because it is a bench trial, because the judge has so much power, it just makes the canvassing and a show of public support feel that much more important,” said Jackson, the No More Deaths volunteer.

She notes there’s a new risk involved as she continues to work with the aid group.

“We have to train our volunteers and say, ‘By putting water out in the desert, you may be facing misdemeanor charges, are you prepared for that?’” Jackson said.

She initially thought the trials would cause a drop in No More Death’s volunteer program as the risk for prosecution increases.

However, the opposite has occurred.

“More people than ever are saying they’re ready to take charges if necessary. Because it’s being criminalized, they feel even more empowered,” Jackson said.

But as motivation behind their efforts continue, so do the tensions with legal authorities.

As part of Border Patrol’s prevention through deterrence policy, checkpoints are moving north, funneling crossing migrants into deeper, more dangerous terrain.

Art Del Cueto, vice president of the National Border Patrol Council, argues the aid humanitarian groups put out in the desert isn’t going to “the greater good.”

“While it’s humanitarian of them to want to put this out there and try to help these people, it’s not going to them,” Del Cueto said. “It’s going to the drug cartels, it’s going to the people smuggling, and it’s going to the scouts that are up there trying to harm. It’s not being used for the purpose they intended.”

The question of who really uses the aid No More Deaths provides is not new.

“We don’t know who’s utilizing our aid, and we don’t believe that anyone deserves to die in the desert,” volunteer Justine Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “Documented or undocumented, we don’t know someone’s circumstance, and it doesn’t diminish someone’s humanity.”

While the weekend canvassing was taking place, four volunteer teams took trucks out on supply drops in the desert.

Jackson and Orlovsky-Schnitzler made up the team leaving water and beans at a supply drop in the Arivaca area. According to Jackson, this particular location is where migrants would be five to six days after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

However, the organization’s efforts to provide water do not mean those who need it will receive it.

Jackson and Orlovsky-Schnitzler arrived at the supply drop to find the aid they left there two weeks ago destroyed. Every 1-gallon jug of water had been slashed open, and every can of SunVista beans dumped on the ground.

The volunteers, carrying a new round of supplies on their backs, began picking up the empty water jugs scattered throughout the site.

“It’s always ironic when you come back from a day where were doing water drops and fighting littering charges, but we actually just cleaned up,” Jackson said. “They made it litter.”

Past incident with Customs and Border Patrol

In January 2018, No More Deaths released a report alleging Border Patrol agents intentionally destroyed aid left for migrants. The report details that more than 3,000 gallons of water have been dumped and reveals videos of Border Patrol agents allegedly intentionally destroying aid from 2010-2017.

Del Cueto said only a small percentage of Border Patrol agents engaged in such behavior and they do not accurately reflect the governmental agency as a whole.

“It’s been determined that it’s been less than one percent of individuals within the Border Patrol that actually have committed atrocities,” Del Cueto said. “I can assure you that the individuals that I represent, and the individuals that I have worked with for quite a number of years now do not adhere to those types of policy.”

Although it is unclear who is to blame for destroying aid left in the desert, the issue still persists.

“A few bad apples are not slashing thousands of gallons,” Jackson said.

Fighting back in a significant political backdrop

No More Deaths is going to trial amidst the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. In order to reopen the government, Trump is requesting $5.7 billion for funding a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. He also said the need for a barrier is clear through the ongoing “humanitarian crisis” at the border.

As No More Deaths volunteers work directly in the borderlands of Arizona, they do not question the validity of a humanitarian crisis at the border.

“When Trump speaks of the humanitarian crisis, it’s devoid of the context it needs to be understood in,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “There’s a humanitarian crisis, we just have to ask what’s causing it.”

Opinions differ on why the border is a danger to human life, but for Del Cueto, the answer to the issue of illegal immigration itself is clear.

“Nobody’s against immigration. We’re against illegal immigration,” Del Cueto said. “It’s a simple process, that’s why we have ports of entries and that’s where people are supposed to present themselves to enter our country.”

However, No More Deaths volunteers believe the current tensions surrounding the issue of border control are emboldening the administration to threaten the group’s ability to provide aid to migrants.

“This work on the border has been going on for years and years, it didn’t appear out of a vacuum when Trump was elected,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “With change in administration and policy, there’s different approaches to administration. I think the time and place was maybe right for them to start ramping up their efforts to legally challenge what we do.”

Despite the political backdrop the case is progressing in, there are still large questions looming about the legality of providing humanitarian aid along the border. No matter which way the verdict goes, No More Deaths members said they intend to keep fighting the criminalization of their actions.

“It’s not over until it’s gone all the way up. You can continue to appeal, and people are certainly prepared for that,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “Regardless of the outcome of trials, if the need is still there, we’re not gonna go away.”

Even through intense uncertainty, No More Deaths has one clear goal in sight.

“What we ultimately want is the ability to provide humanitarian aid, but then even further than that, making it unnecessary for humanitarian aid,” Jackson said. “We want an end to the deaths and disappearances in the desert.”

Jan. 18, 2019 Decision

Related articles:

CBP, Yuma Hospital Busy With Illegal Alien Medical Issues

Largest Group Of Illegal Aliens Enters Yuma Sector

Southwest Sheriffs: “We Must Secure Our Southern Border With Mexico”

Mr. President, Keep Up The Border Fight

18 Comments

  1. Why aren’t the illegals charged, imprisoned for six months, then deported? Illegal aliens get a free pass, but Americans are charged for the same crime. That’s not right.

  2. aiding and abetting criminal activity is a crime especially if it encourages violation of Federal laws. Anyone who gives shelter aids with supplies or helps traffic illegal aliens should be put in jail. We didn’t invite them to cross the border illegally. We need that wall to keep them out

  3. It’s called abetting a crime. These poor unfortunate people are breaking the law. They’ve put themselves and families in danger. Drive them to the border and head them south if you want to help. Don’t help them come into the country illegally.

  4. Littering and driving off road in a closed area – typical above the law liberals. Encouraging/assisting people in crossing illegally is not a humanitarian act. This has been going on for far too long. Build the wall, it will save lives.

  5. The best humanitarian aid is to keep them in their OWN COUNTRIES! Teach them to have a backbone and start their own revolution if that is what it takes. This migration is all BS because mexico has offered them jobs and places to stay, but I guess the hard part is that they have to WORK for a living and will not be given HANDOUTS.

    But again folks like albert who support the democrap way is more than willing to SADDLE the american people with these folks and then wonder how this became a 4th world country.

  6. Wanting to help those hell-bent on crossing the desert (illegal or not) is their choice. Driving a vehicle in a wilderness and having no permit is their choice as well. Get a permit and don’t drive in a wilderness area if you want to continue! It’s amazing to me that those people think they are above the law just because they are “humanitarians”!!!

    • It’s not about being “above the law.” Were the civil rights sit-ins that helped end legal segregation — including in Arizona’s Constitution — wrong? They were unlawful, according to racist laws, but there is a higher moral calling when a law is unjust. Was slavery right when it was “legal?”

      Were the Auto Workers sit-down strikes in the 1930s that — gasp! — took over private property illegal? Yup — and those sit-downs helped give birth to a labor movement that created the now-shrinking American middle class.

      And going back even further, was it legal for American colonists to declare their independence from England and take up arms to fight the ruling power? Hell no! There are so many areas of human progress that required people of conscience to take a stand regardless of the law. Thank goodness for those “criminals!” Where would we be without them?

      • There is a Wilderness Area that I would love to be able to drive in and hunt big game but I respect the law that says you can’t. So, I don’t drive in there and I have a permit to be in there! Strictly referring to the situation in the article, get a friggin permit, don’t drive in a Wilderness Area and they can help all they want.

      • Albert would you say the same for the business that refuses to bake a cake to a same sex couple based on their religion? They have a right to follow their faith as the Constitution claims.
        “What is the right of freedom of religion? Article 9 states
        “the freedom to change religion or belief. the freedom to exercise religion or belief publicly or privately, alone or with others. The freedom to exercise religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
        The key words being to “exercise” and “practice”. So those who refuse to bake a cake with two men or women are breaking the law by refusing?, they are getting sued and losing their business and future incomes! you call that ok? They are breaking the law right? Faith is personal and should be part of how they do business,it’s their identity,or else they are hypocrites. What happens then? “Love thy neighbor” goes out the window by those suing. Temper tantrums on a high level by dragging these poor cake bakers to court and legally robbing them. You can’t have it both ways sir.

  7. This was an unfortunate waste of tax payer dollars. Humanitarian aid should not be a crime. Our country is heading into a direction that is truly sad for all.

    I agree with Albert’s statement as well.

  8. Nail ’em. Who funds this group? They sent volunteers to Guatemala when the first border invasion began. Being responsible and obey the law is humanitarian. If you want them in our country take them into your home and stop passing the buck to the taxpayers. Humanitarian my Butt.

    • “If giving water to someone dying of thirst is illegal, what humanity is left in the law of this country?”

      The only bucks being passed to taxpayers are the costs of arrest, trial and imprisonment for doing what, “loving thy neighbor as thyself?”

  9. Shameful! Saving lives is ruled criminal behavior, but destruction of life-saving water containers is apparently perpetrated by official agents of the federal government.
    Pouring water into the desert soil is OK; trying to save lives is not.
    And this has been going on since long before the Trump administration began reigning.
    This is one more example of the inverted and perverted legal system operating in these United States. We have no justice system, just an insane batch of laws seemingly working more to harm than to protect.
    If there are to be governments, and if there are to be laws, they should serve only to protect rights, perhaps to punish those who violate rights.
    WHO, in this situation, is violating rights?
    Therefore the question is, WHO is the real criminal?

    • “Therefore the question is, WHO is the real criminal?”
      The real criminal are the persons breaking the laws of this country to invade. The second criminals are the people encouraging the law breakers by leaving food and water so they can continue in their invasion.
      What are the effects of the invasion?
      The taxpayer must support these law breakers almost for the rest of their lives, why? they don’t speak English, have any skills and receive money,shelter,food and free medical care at the taxpayers expense. Quite a few of them are criminals who rob, and murder citizens and bring drugs into this country to enslave and cause death to people, particularly young people who lets face it aren’t always too smart.
      This BS of “doing jobs Americans won’t do” is just that,BS.
      Oh and how about wanting to improve their lives? Yeah, what if I wanted to improve my life by robbing a bank? even in another country, think the judge will go for that defense? I think not.
      These people should get a lot more time and monetary fines than what they got. As for loving my neighbors, I love George & Betty to my left and Blanco and his family to the right of my house and I help them out any time they need it. They are hard working citizens of this country, not law breakers.

    • Simple solution: get the Feds out of resource preservation and immigration and return it to the States as its supposed to be

      • Really?
        Get the Feds out of immigration?
        Like the Constitution doesn’t exist?
        The States have NEVER had authority to authorize immigration.

Comments are closed.