House Majority Leader Michael Carbone criticized Governor Hobbs’ newly released energy plan, saying the plan puts utility-scale solar projects, green energy contractors, and government spending ahead of housing, taxpayers, and lower costs.
Hobbs released her plan which details 31 recommendations taking aim at data centers and advancing “clean energy deployment.”
“Hobbs is calling this an all-of-the-above energy plan. It’s not,” said Carbone. “It’s a solar-heavy political plan that puts green industry insiders ahead of taxpayers, pushes utility-scale solar onto state land that could support badly needed housing, and says nothing about lowering gas prices for Arizona families. When Hobbs says ‘all of the above,’ what she means is more wind and solar.”
The Governor’s report calls for more utility-scale wind and solar development on state land, new solar development on state-owned buildings, and enrollment of public assets into virtual power plant programs. At the same time, it puts green energy development ahead of Arizona’s housing needs on state land and stays silent on the gas price issues hitting Arizona drivers the hardest claims Carbone.
According to the Common Sense Institute, as many as 276,000 acres of state land within a 10-mile radius of incorporated cities and towns could support up to 200,000 new housing units. The Hobbs administration, however, has identified land closest to existing residential areas as “best” for solar development. State land should be used to maximize value for trust beneficiaries through open, competitive public auctions, not steered toward one politically favored industry while closing the door to others, including homebuilding.
“Housing is in short supply, prices are too high, and families are being pushed into denser and denser housing areas,” Carbone said. “Now Hobbs wants to use state land that is ripe for housing development to build massive solar projects near existing residential communities at a discount. That is bad policy, and Arizona families will pay for it.”
Restrictive bidder qualifications that result in only one bid at public auction also raise serious questions about whether the state is securing full value for K-12 education and other trust beneficiaries. Since January 2023, nine of the ten solar leases on state land have drawn only one bidder. Only one solar lease in the last three years produced a rental rate secured through a truly competitive bidding process.
“The Governor has a constitutional obligation to ensure state land goes to the highest and best bidder at public auction,” Carbone said. “She should let the market compete and let the best use win. Don’t skew the process to favor one predetermined winner. Don’t box out competition. And don’t leave millions of dollars on the table that should be going to support our schools. Arizona electric utilities use an open, competitive, all-source bidding process to decide who wins. State land should be no different.”
The plan also calls for installing rooftop solar on public buildings and opens the door to other major government contracts for so-called green energy upgrades. That means more taxpayer dollars flowing to special interest groups and politically connected vendors, even as state government continues claiming agencies are stretched thin and resources are limited. That pattern has defined much of her tenure as governor.
“Arizonans don’t want their tax dollars turned into a funding stream for green energy insiders,” Carbone said. “Building rooftop solar on government buildings will not reduce the price of gas or utilities for Arizona families. The renewable energy industry already benefits from millions of dollars each year in Arizona property tax subsidies and more than $2.3 billion in ratepayer surcharges tied to renewable mandates pushed by liberals like former Corporation Commissioner Kris Mayes. It does not need more handouts. Hobbs should explain exactly who benefits, how much it will cost, and why this is a higher priority than housing, affordability, and basic taxpayer accountability.”
Carbone accuses Hobbs of failing to address another major affordability problem for Arizona families: rising gas prices and growing fuel supply pressure as California refineries continue to shut down. Her report, claims Carbone, says nothing about the cost of gas in Arizona, offers no response to the state’s boutique fuel blend problem, and ignores the need for new infrastructure such as pipelines and refineries.
“You cannot claim to have an energy plan for Arizona while ignoring gasoline prices, fuel supply, and the infrastructure needed to keep this state moving,” Carbone said. “This report does not confront boutique fuel problems, does not address refinery or pipeline capacity, and does not even include the industry that supplies the fuel Arizona families and businesses rely on every day. That is not all of the above. That is selective politics dressed up as policy.”
The report follows months of task forces, meetings, and bureaucratic exercises that added little to what was already known, while House Republicans have continued pushing practical policies focused on reliable energy, lower costs, housing supply, and long-term infrastructure.
“Her report is long on politics and short on answers,” Carbone said. “It does not lower costs. It does not increase housing supply. It does not put taxpayers first. House Republicans are focused on affordability, reliability, and policies that serve Arizona families, not a narrow political agenda.”

Jusy more posturing BY BOTH sides and this is the problem, there have been articles about colorado river shortage and here is a link to a recent opinion piece: https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2026/03/27/water-gasoline-hobbs-regime-failures-on-basic-stuff-is-what-flakes-do/
I also saw a program that he 10 towns around east LA are being restricted from building houses etc due to water issues so do we need to worry or again is this just posturing? ucson recently said they are going to initiate water restrictions so who is lieing about this issue? Remember nappy said about 25 years or so ago that she was going to initiate a refinery because kalif was not a reliable source for fuels. Dont know what happened or was this another democrap promise that was like all others never to be delivered? Yes need housing but here are many overpriced ones available now so do we really need more? As to business and solar/wind systems go I have seen business with wind and solar on their footprint so do we need to waste more space on this issue? Seems to me they need to build their own systems and run it themselves, and the quantities of water required they need to develope new cooling systems that is less water reliant but like all things they will try to get the pols involved so they can stay on the public tit just like the baseball, basketball, football teams do. Some one someday needs to realize the people and the state come 1st and this is a prime example by the politicians NOW.
This is a BS run by both sides. They reported
a couple of days ago that there will be a water
crisis and then another report that housing construction
has been put on hold for just about all phx
Area development. They need to get their act together cant have both. I have seen a couple of places
with wind/solar being built right next to the facility.
But as can be seen by both parties the state
Is not a concern it seems. Tucson has announced
Potential water restrictions so this is all
political posturing and thats all it is. We need
to have a reliable fuel system established 1st
since kalif is falling apart at the seems. Rember
Napilotano said she was going to have one
built 25 years ago so where is it or was that
just another democrap promise that like all
the others is never to be delivered. The hobbit
could be the same and push the lie/promise
again!
Elections have consequences! Heard that before? Problem is the ill-informed voters will probably re-elect the POS!